You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics
Search options (Page 48 of 66)
Topics by F1ReB4LL User defined search
Posts found: 1,176 to 1,200 of 1,638
https://www.sendspace.com/file/4nvir6 -- misdetected index in "separate tracks" cue, in the img cue the index is correct. Weird, because there's only 1 track.
http://redump.org/disc/37761/ -- not my dump, so I'm not sure if the latest DIC version was used.
Enker wrote:I saw fuzzball's dumps, but I thought only DIC dumps are accepted for verifies, right?
Multi-track dumps won't get a green flag, yes. 1-track PSX (but only PSX and maybe PS2 CD) dumps are ok to be green, but the more important part is to add all the new serials and editions and remove them from the PSX missing list on wiki.
Gore has its own project (and even now he's busy in RL upto the August), ack is new and only adds ps2 dumps (including yours), iR0b0t doesn't have a time even to read any PMs, Nexy only adds his own PC dumps, Jackal also mostly adds PC, dunno about Enker and Usurper. I've almost finished with the earlier PCE submissions, checking fuzzball's PSX verifications atm, then will process the Saturn ones (yours and Hustle's).
haynor666 wrote:I tried some audio cd and I get different result when adding /a 30 (drive should have offset 30). Is this /a 30 correct to add or should I leave this option and let DIC decide?
Why not to compare with EAC's 0 and +30 dumps?
IIRC, /a 30 should be used (unless there's a built-in drives/offsets db).
Subdump subs would be useful as well.
Well, usually the only question is if the drive supports 0xd8 to avoid the automatic descrambling. GD-ROMs and certain protections need specific drives, though, but it's a different story.
haynor666 wrote:Since I didn't find any info about Plextor PX-W5224TA
http://forum.redump.org/search/ -- "Plextor PX-W5224TA" -- magic!
http://www.filedropper.com/tr3-macsuberror
http://www.filedropper.com/tr3-mac
First link - >1GB DIC error log for http://redump.org/disc/14386/ from GreyFox. First time he tried to dump it with DIC, it crashed with AppCrash message and the log was also more than 1GB, second time it haven't crashed, but the log was as huge.
Second link - subdump. S-W channels are filled with 0xFF, channel R has data and the last 50 sectors are filled with different data, even the P and Q channels.
I like the ClrMAMEPro layout more
sarami wrote:I found the crash occured with relative path. fixed it.
Works now, but could you fix the text alignment inside the dat?
https://www.sendspace.com/file/9fgguh -- clrmamepro dat vs. dic dat
Usually it happens where the verification was incomplete (due to read errors). But can't say for sure about this case.
sarami wrote:Thanks test but it works fine on my pc... I don't know the reason at the present moment.
Test version is using xmllite.dll. if this dll doesn't exist in your pc, please install it.
if it isn't so, I want the detailed info. (e.g. event viewer)
xmllite.dll is installed, event viewer logs look useless to me:
Faulting application name: DiscImageCreator.exe, version: 0.0.0.0, time stamp: 0x56dd9865
Faulting module name: DiscImageCreator.exe, version: 0.0.0.0, time stamp: 0x56dd9865
Exception code: 0xc0000005
Fault offset: 0x00004ef6
Faulting process id, Faulting application start time, Report Id are, of course, always different.
Sorry for the late report, but it crashes (APPCRASH) when "Creating bin, cue and ccd (Track)". Even when I don't use C2 reporting and simply run it as "DiscImageCreator.exe cd H: dump 4".
mainError.txt file is empty, I don't see anything describing the crash reason.
Egen wrote:I very clearly remember a Flame of Recca Final Burning dump being on the site because it was literally the first NTSC-J game I ever got and I remember being excited to see it on the database. But last year, I did an entire database check at some point against my own collection to see if things were kosher between the two, and I discovered that dump had disappeared. I'm actually the one that added it back in.
Hidden, status was changed to Red by Jackal on Mar 31 2010, 11:42.
http://forum.redump.org/post/29778/#p29778 -- do you still have those?
Especially, [T-2301G] The Hyper Golf: Devil's Course, [T-6009G] Yuushun Classic Road and [T-21601G] The Tower?
I don't see any Puyo Puyo Fever hidden dumps, try to PM ir0b0t. A week ago ack2121 said he has submitted the [PSX] Doki Doki Poyatchio!! dump and it also disappeared (he resubmitted it later and it was added), so, maybe, some db glitches?
We don't have Novus2 in out shops as well just like Brasso Shoe polish is an interesting idea, though.
tossEAC wrote:I was hoping you would be interested as I seem to remember I sent someone Brasso, but that might not have been you.
It was me, still using it sometimes (though, I'm trying not not to buy scratched discs), very helpful. The only hint I can give about when polishing with Brasso - never ever put your finger into the center hole while polishing, otherwise, it ends with lots of cracks in the middle.
axisleon wrote:My suggestion: WYSIWYG
Real WYSIWYG = scan.
Maybe worth to make a youtube video?
MigaMan wrote:Unfortunately there is no other image to compare with because the original printing of the game was never dumped properly and is far too expensive to purchase anymore.
One of our dumpers had purchased the original a few months ago, though, no idea about when will we see the dump.
Btw, according to the necstasy.net, the last data tracks should differ in size and crc, so, not only audio tracks differ.
I've created the directory "C:\test", put the remove.exe tool there and created the datfile using Dir2Dat in ClrMAMEPro:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE datafile PUBLIC "-//Logiqx//DTD ROM Management Datafile//EN" "http://www.logiqx.com/Dats/datafile.dtd">
<datafile>
<header>
<name>-insert name-</name>
<description>-insert description-</description>
<category>Standard DatFile</category>
<version>-insert version-</version>
<date>-insert date-</date>
<author>-insert author-</author>
<email>-insert email-</email>
<homepage>-insert homepage-</homepage>
<url>-insert url-</url>
<comment>-insert comment-</comment>
<clrmamepro/>
</header>
<game name="test">
<description>test</description>
<rom name="remove.exe" size="99328" crc="65f5cd29" md5="8d4616abe8a949362b4b69d5417e678f" sha1="96d36b0cfa9240ef4c0502f4ea0d1f682ba277d9"/>
</game>
</datafile>
So the ClrMAMEPro puts directory name into "game name" and "description". I think DIC can put the "filename" name there from the commandline (cd <DriveLetter> <Filename> <DriveSpeed(0-72)> [/a (val)]).
Why not to generate a good ClrMAMEPro-compliant dat with <header></header>, <game name></game>, etc.? Current DIC dats are unusable in ClrMAME unless you add all the missing fields manually.
I can't say without looking the dump, but it's common, so, very likely.
Posts found: 1,176 to 1,200 of 1,638