Updated to "Sony PlayStation (2467) (2009-04-01 05-39-56).dat"

Sony PlayStation PAL (1143) (2009-04-01 05-39-56)
Sony PlayStation NTSC-J (728) (2009-04-01 05-39-56)
Sony PlayStation NTSC-U (596) (2009-04-01 05-39-56)

77

(17 replies, posted in News)

I do not have usenet access, but I can send them to anyone who wants to upload them there :-)

Redump.org only hosts the CUE sheets for the discs, not the data. :-)

79

(1 replies, posted in General discussion)

http://cgi.ebay.de/Nahezu-Vollstaendige … 240%3A1307

Discuss! tongue

One could go with no-intro naming.

Redump offers a (hidden) no-intro style dat already, except game languages are not added to it (yet?).

For people who are serious with dumping, they should refer to the online database, and not to the dat alone. :-)

81

(4 replies, posted in General discussion)

The disc is without the -01, so it's a normal edition an not player's choice :x

82

(4 replies, posted in General discussion)

Maybe the parser removes it.

What I have seen was that most Player's Choice Editions had a -01 appended to the serial.
Star Fox Adventures is one example, Mario Party 4 is another: Serial: DL-DOL-GMPP-EUR-01

Maybe it is not important and it only means that this disc belonged to a 'Player's Choice' edition.
But this would also mean that my NFS Underground (G) is from a normal copy in a Player's Choice DVD case.

83

(4 replies, posted in General discussion)

Why does the -01 gets removed from the GC serial numbers?

84

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

ssjkakaroto wrote:

Though the 7z size was the same on both machines, their md5 was different.

Can you do a binary compare to see how different those 2 files are? Maybe there is only a difference in the file header or the whole data stream is different.

85

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

Compression algorithms are usually integer based.
So far same versions of 7zip used with the same options made identical results.
That is at least true for the Windows version of 7zip. smile

86

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

So far, files compressed with packiso have been identical for different people on different computers. Of course there is the possibility that there is an odd configuration where the result will be different, but this could happen with torrentzip aswell.

Those people should try it instead of praying. big_smile

87

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

Delete this post, since the server was misbehaving again :x

88

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

BadSector wrote:

Oh thanks for this info, didn't knew that. So this mean that if i used the ultra setting instead of default in Packps2, it will still make the same Archives?

It will make the same archives when you use the same settings. Compressing with 7z ultra leads of course to higher compression vs. the normal 7z compression (because of Increased dictionary size). But every computer has to have enough resources to use such a large dictionary, else compression outcome might differ (when there is extensive paging for example).
Also you could use other advanced settings to improve compression.

ssjkakaroto wrote:

Are you sure about that Sotho Tal Ker? Even the slightest difference in floating-point calculations across CPU's/OS's can cause the archive to be completely different. Unless 7zip uses only integers values. Do you know if that's the case?

Well, I am not completely sure (I did not look at the source of 7-zip), but so far packISO did work for many people on many different computers. Unless someone comes with an example that the file created is different, it stands as is (it's not a mathematical proof, but a natural ... it is right until someone disproves it). Of course everyone has to use the same 7-zip version.

89

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

BadSector wrote:
Sotho Tal Ker wrote:

If everyone uses the same 7zip version, it should be the same file for everyone. smile

Actually No, it will not create same Archive on different PCs, if you look into your Packiso folder, there will be a file called RMDtrach.exe (or somewhat similar name), that exe it what make it possible to get same images on different PC.

Well, yes, i forgot rmdtrash. What is does is zeroing the created/modified/accessed times.
Still 7za will create exactly the same files on different machines with exactly (Which means file times are identical, too) the same source files. smile

90

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

Well, so far what packiso did was just this:
use ECM on the first track, then just call 7za on the file: "7za a [...]"

If everyone uses the same 7zip version, it should be the same file for everyone. smile

The normal add operation uses a dictionary of d=16MB, means it needs 11.5*d+3.5 MB of memory to compress the file. Using ultra compression uses a larger dictionary, but this means, more memory for compression is needed. Computers with less than 1.5GB RAM won't be able to use ultra compression at all. (It might be possible on computers with 1GB, but this means that no other tasks must be running, that you have around 700MB free)

91

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

Because people often refer to cd based images as "iso" - probably because .iso was the first format that showd up.

packISO is just a set of tools designed to give better compression but still creating the same archive on any platform/pc.
You could do those steps manually, but packISO just creates the batch files for you and executes them. smile

ECM only works for CD images (not DVD), and only for .bin/cdi/mds with a sector size of 2352 compared to .iso with 2048 sector size. (ISO file format does not store EDC and ECC data).
ECM checks this EDC and ECC data and removes it when it matches the calculation of that sector. (It is a bit more advanced, though)

For Wii DVD images you do not need that. You would just scrub the image with WiiScrubber (with creating a diff file) and then use 7zip 4.57 with the standard options to compress the image.

92

(62 replies, posted in General discussion)

It is not torrentzip's fault that it does not work on files > 2GB. It's an inherent zip misfeature. Zip is a very old format where people only dreamed about files that big. Also it had to work with very little memory so the dictionary it uses is very small (32kb) compared to more modern archivers (rar has up to 4mb dictionary, 7z can use up to 64mb [provided you have the memory for that])
Though the zip format gets still developed and it is possible to use it with a bigger dictionary and also with lzma as compression method, this is far away from being standard yet, so most zip applications cannot read those zip archives. (Zip is more of a container format where you can use different compression formats like store, implode, deflate... and on. But even the deflate64 method which has been integrated into zip is not supported by many applications yet [which is just deflate with a 64kb dictionary])
Maybe in the future there will be a zip feature to allow files >2gb.

There are other limitations aswell for zip files like no unicode support and a timestamp accuracy of 2 seconds, but I will stop here. smile

93

(62 replies, posted in General discussion)

Don't use the 4.58 beta as it slightly compresses better than previous versions wink
Stick with 4.57 which offers the same compression ratio as 4.53 beta.
(Else packiso'd files will differ between people using 4.53b-4.57 and 4.58b. Since packiso was invented to offer something very similar to torrentzip but with better compression using different 7zip version destroys this benefit tongue)

94

(2 replies, posted in General discussion)

The system is too new to be preserved. tongue

95

(12 replies, posted in General discussion)

The easiest process for NOOBS is not merge anything at all wink

You can get the date with psxt001z.exe - more reliable than isobuster for me smile
Also make sure you trim the pregap which got extracted at the end of the first track.

97

(7 replies, posted in General discussion)

The new clrmame can generate dats in the old "deprecated" format again. wink
So it is possible to add dumps again for you people posting on the forums... big_smile

98

(5 replies, posted in General discussion)

1. ClrMame can scan anything wink

2. ClrMame does not recognize the packed datatrack either, because it was reduced to ECM-format before packing it with 7z.

3. You can use unpackiso to restore the previous uncompressed binary files. Those files are in the database and in the dat-file and thus are recognized by ClrMame.

There could be another dat file that would contain the ecm'd and ape'd format. But that would require too much work. In fact i consider packiso to not be the best thing to use, as it does not use optimal settings (ape encoder with slower insane setting could reduce audio track data by another 5-10MB and optimized 7z settings could reduce in further compression too, without being too memory intensive. A 32MB dictionary requires 372MB of memory for packing, which means every computer with 1GB of RAM can handle that. Also one could use the advanced options which would make the process slower but the compression better. Equally on all computers out there.)

99

(1 replies, posted in General discussion)

The only thing I know is AccurateRip in conjunction with EAC.