151

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

KailoKyra wrote:

DIC crashes when "checking EXEs" :

It's invalid report.
See, please. https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … _report.md

152

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

Updated 2022-02-01 version
https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … g/20220201
*2022-02-01
- added: /vrfy flag for checking non-zero byte of audio CD
- added: buffer size check when IMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY is outputted
- added: support for reading cache via 0xF1 on HL-DT-ST BD-RE WH14NS48 v.1.D3
- changed: "DATE" to "wmic os get LocalDateTime" when createBuildDateTime.bat is created
- changed: check disk free space
- changed: Hash image while dumping (DVD, BD)
- fixed: trim the string of i6comp.exe
- fixed: string (x86 -> 32 bit)
- fixed: ARccOS is checked by DVD-Video
- fixed: cue file when /p is used
- fixed: disk space checking for linux
- fixed: when used .petite, it's skipped reading Export, Import, Resource data due to the compressed data
- fixed: dumping of "Star Wars - Shadows of the Empire Soundtrack"

153

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

gmipf wrote:

Is it just max speed

Yes.

154

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

drfsupercenter wrote:

I'm told by some people on Discord that ARccOS is detected by looking for files in a certain area of the disc that is normally blank.  This actually caused some older and non-Sony DVDs to be falsely flagged as having ARccOS, which is why this came up.

Yes, https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … issues/100 https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … issues/102
I've searched for the magic string like MVSNRGFP, but couldn't find it.

drfsupercenter wrote:

what is RGFP?

RG is RipGuard? FP... I don't know. File? Flag? Pointer? Position?

drfsupercenter wrote:

Are there any other methods of anti-ripping protection (besides the CSS/CPPM encryption that's been standard since DVD's inception) on DVD-Video discs besides "MVSNRGFP" and ARccOS that you are aware of?

Not yet.

155

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jackal wrote:

No PVD is detected on this disc, but sector 16 has a normal PVD, so I wonder what the problem is?

It's a known issue.
http://forum.redump.org/post/94542/#p94542
I have no idea about it now.

156

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

user7 wrote:

here's another disc you might want to snag for study

I have already another one.
http://forum.redump.org/post/84421/#p84421
I redumped it, but it generated the same hash.

157

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

gmipf wrote:

Something weird is going on on my side. In your logs it seems the protected sectors are handled correctly but on my side it tries to reread some of the sectors despite being already detected as protected.

My disc doesn't have an intentional C2 error. It seems several versions(?) exist in this protection.

158

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

gmipf wrote:

@sarami: I wanted to know how you did dumped that disc: http://redump.org/disc/45814/

Did you just used the /sf command for Bitpool?

Redumped it. https://www.mediafire.com/file/7r5xtssh … og.7z/file

159

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jackal wrote:

Why is it counting 150 sectors as part of write offset? Is it a bug?

As it is written in the comment of http://redump.org/disc/77974/ , these discs start AMSF 00:00:00, not 00:02:00. Due to this problem, there is not the sync in the last 150 data sectors. EccEdc judges it as error.

Jackal wrote:

Here is my proposed method for automatic offset detection for Audio CD's:

I translate the src I already coded to English. Thanks to Intothisworld, perhaps it's almost coded except -10.000 to +10.000 samples you say.
I hope to test the latest version of the https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … /issues/95 to more people.

1. Check the non-zero byte position from last - 75 to last + 75.
2. Check the non-zero byte position from LBA 0 - 75 to LBA 0 + 75.
3-1. If the difference of the last non-zero byte position and 1st non-zero byte position are bigger than 0 sample and smaller than 588 samples...
3-1-1. If the last non-zero byte position is equal to the 1st non-zero byte position, Set the custom offset.
3-1-2. If the last non-zero byte position is bigger than the 1st non-zero byte position, It can't set the custom offset.
3-1-3. If the last non-zero byte position is smaller than the 1st non-zero byte position.
3-1-3-1. If the 1st non-zero byte position is smaller than the combined offset, Set the custom offset.
3-1-3-2. If not 3-1-3-1, it's no need to fix the combined offset.
3-2. If the difference of the last non-zero byte position and 1st non-zero byte position are bigger than 588 samples... (last < 1st)
3-2-1. If the last non-zero byte exists in the last sector or lead-out and the 1st non-zero byte exists in the LBA 0 or backward.
3-2-1-1. If the last non-zero byte position exists in the last sector and its position is smaller than the combined offset, it's no need to fix the combined offset.
3-2-1-2. If not 3-2-1-1, set the custom offset.
3-2-2. If the last non-zero byte exists in the forward than the last sector and the 1st non-zero byte exists in the LBA 0 or backward.
3-2-2-1. If the 1st non-zero byte exists in the LBA 0 and the 1st non-zero byte position is smaller than the combined offset, Set the custom offset.
3-2-2-2. If not 3-2-2-1, it's no need to fix the combined offset.
3-2-3. If the last non-zero byte exists in the forward than the last sector and the 1st non-zero byte exists in the pregap sector, Set the custom offset.
3-3. If the difference of the last non-zero byte position and 1st non-zero byte position are bigger than 588 samples... (1st < last)
3-3-1. If the 1st non-zero byte exists in the LBA 0 or backward and the last non-zero byte exists in the last sector or lead-out, it can't set the custom offset.
3-3-2. If the 1st non-zero byte exists in the pregap and the last non-zero byte exists in the last sector or lead-out, it can't set the custom offset.
3-3-3. If the last non-zero byte exists in the last sector and the last non-zero byte position is smaller than the combined offset, it's no need to fix the combined offset.
3-3-4. if not 3-3-3, set the custom offset.
3-3-5. If the 1st non-zero byte exists in the pregap and the last non-zero byte exists in the forward than the last sector, it can't set the custom offset.
3-3-6. If not 3-3-5, it's no need to fix the combined offset.

160

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

user7 wrote:

sarami if you're still looking for this VCD http://redump.org/disc/74810/ which gives wonky errors, there's one in this pack that ships worldwide: https://www.ebay.nl/itm/265429499035

Ordered it.

KailoKyra wrote:

I managed to grab another copy, same ringcode and all... and this time it worked without issues.
So likely something bad going on with the discs themselves even if they don't look visually bad.

It's weird... Do you upload these logs? Generally, "MEDIUM_ERROR - NO SEEK COMPLETE" is a drive problem.

161

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

I've been tired to say "Please use the latest version" every time, especially MPF users.
I recommend github issue from now on when the bug is reported.
If it is reported in this forum, see the bug_report.md.

162

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

retaliator wrote:

Tried to dump PS2 cheat discs with big data protection, always getting different hashes with newest versions of DIC, DICUI and DIC_test.

statiomaster_032002_20210701T212154.txt --> It's old version. Typically, the bug report of the old version is meaningless.

And it's a known issue. http://forum.redump.org/post/96246/#p96246 http://forum.redump.org/post/96445/#p96445
Please check which bytes of the img of the latest DIC are different using fc command by the command prompt.

fc /b statiomaster_022002.img statiomaster_032002.img

163

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

KailoKyra wrote:

I'm trying to dump one of the missing XBOX games ("Scarface") that DIC seems to have an issue with right at the start.

Same problem. http://forum.redump.org/post/97197/#p97197

Scarface is http://redump.org/disc/60487/ ? or http://redump.org/disc/36869/ ?
Tell me Amazon or eBay link, plz.

164

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jackal wrote:

Is it correct?

SubQ indicates it is correct.

LBA[000000, 0000000]: P[ff], Q[410100000005000002004cb6]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[01], Idx[00], RMSF[00:00:05], AMSF[00:02:00]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[000001, 0x00001]: P[ff], Q[41010000000400000201f6c6]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[01], Idx[00], RMSF[00:00:04], AMSF[00:02:01]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[000002, 0x00002]: P[ff], Q[41010000000300000202a171]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[01], Idx[00], RMSF[00:00:03], AMSF[00:02:02]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[000003, 0x00003]: P[ff], Q[410100000002000002031b01]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[01], Idx[00], RMSF[00:00:02], AMSF[00:02:03]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[000004, 0x00004]: P[ff], Q[410100000001000002048534]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[01], Idx[00], RMSF[00:00:01], AMSF[00:02:04]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[000005, 0x00005]: P[ff], Q[410101000000000002057897]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[01], Idx[01], RMSF[00:00:00], AMSF[00:02:05]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[000006, 0x00006]: P[00], Q[41010100000100000206e2a5]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[01], Idx[01], RMSF[00:00:01], AMSF[00:02:06]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[000007, 0x00007]: P[00], Q[410101000002000002071c56]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[01], Idx[01], RMSF[00:00:02], AMSF[00:02:07]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]

165

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

superg wrote:

I got "_alt.cue" and "_imgAlt.cue"

CD-TEXT can store 8 languages.

                     Language code BLOCK 0: 0x09 (English)
                     Language code BLOCK 1: 0x69 (Japanese)
                     Language code BLOCK 2: 0x00 (not applicable)
                     Language code BLOCK 3: 0x00 (not applicable)
                     Language code BLOCK 4: 0x00 (not applicable)
                     Language code BLOCK 5: 0x00 (not applicable)
                     Language code BLOCK 6: 0x00 (not applicable)
                     Language code BLOCK 7: 0x00 (not applicable)

BLOCK 1 language uses _alt.cue, BLOCK 2 language uses _alt2.cue ... BLOCK 7 language uses _alt7.cue

166

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

I don't have ARM machine, so I can't test.

167

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

Yurgen wrote:

 I now get another compilation error

fixed typo (off_t -> off64_t)

168

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

Yurgen wrote:

I get the following errors when attempting to build from source with GNU Make 4.2.1 on ARM, default settings.  Am I missing deps?  Or some environment variable?

removed _W64
https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImageCreator

169

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

user7 wrote:

Also the feature to calculate enough free space is broken. I tried dumping a PS3 disc with 119GB free on my hard drive and I got an error.

'bd' command supposes BDXL-R QL.

user7 wrote:

Old and new DIC builds, I'm getting an error with a particular disc in good-enough condition. It's a later Xbox (OG) kiosk disc.

LBA[1913094, 0x1d3106]: [F:ReadXBOXDirectoryRecord][L:1192]
    Opcode: 0xa8
    ScsiStatus: 0x02 = CHECK_CONDITION
    SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 03-02-00 = MEDIUM_ERROR - NO SEEK COMPLETE

Kreon does not support this disc?

170

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jackal wrote:

scanning the .img instead of the .bin files, resulting in an incorrect error count for multisession discs.

https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file
- changed: do not check 11400 sectors of lead-in and lead-out

171

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … /issues/95
If non-zero byte exists in the 1st lead-out, fix the combined offset.
If non-zero byte exists in LBA -1, check only.

172

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … g/20211101
*2021-11-01
- fixed: ReadErrorProtect

173

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

RibShark wrote:

but .010 and .011 files are still skipped

(link is same)
- fixed: check string length

174

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

RibShark wrote:

There is no extension

https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file
- fixed:
Only check files.

175

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

RibShark wrote:

Is there a way to better define which file to skip so it only skips "/SNGM/SNGM"?

Define only filename and extension.