DiscImageCreator (Page 68 of 141)

Jackal · 2019-01-02 07:50:15

Jackal
Moderator (Retired)
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-23
Posts: 4,132

sarami wrote:

I'm not sure about it, but many sony dadc discs have -647. At least, I hope all 99 modified SecuROM discs are dumped again to get _disc.txt.

Does your Colin McRae Rally 2 disc also have -59 in one mode?
I guess we only need to check a couple discs and if they all have this problem, just fix all -59 discs to -647.
I dont know if this also affects discs with +588 offset which should be 0? Many discs have +588.

Jackal wrote:

SubCode[0] dumps only main-channel. dic only uses this to output offsets in _disc.txt. No problem about sub-channel.
Or does this question mean that SecuROM sector 157 haven't fixed yet?

No, this was the only disc

ajshell1 · 2019-01-02 23:16:34

ajshell1
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2017-09-21
Posts: 378

I'd just like to point out that the most recent versions of DIC I tested (The stable one and test version 20181116 95206) still don't detect the SmartE protection on http://redump.org/disc/38957/.

I'm going to test and see if the dump DIC produces matches the DB version. I doubt it will.

Edit: Nope. No it doesn't.

Also, there's this forom the EdcEcc.txt log:

LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060070, 0x0eaa6], MSF[13:22:70], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[060081, 0x0eab1], MSF[13:23:06], mode 1

EDIT2:

I'm getting a similar issue with what appears to be http://redump.org/disc/40523/. The PVD and file size is the same.

LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], mode 1
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059462, 0x0e846], MSF[13:14:62], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[059473, 0x0e851], MSF[13:14:73], mode 1

EDIT3:
What seems to be http://redump.org/disc/29992/ but doesn't match has SmartE detected.

LBA[000988, 0x003dc], MSF[00:15:13], mode 1
LBA[000989, 0x003dd], MSF[00:15:14], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000990, 0x003de], MSF[00:15:15], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000991, 0x003df], MSF[00:15:16], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000992, 0x003e0], MSF[00:15:17], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000993, 0x003e1], MSF[00:15:18], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000994, 0x003e2], MSF[00:15:19], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000995, 0x003e3], MSF[00:15:20], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000996, 0x003e4], MSF[00:15:21], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000997, 0x003e5], MSF[00:15:22], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000998, 0x003e6], MSF[00:15:23], mode 1 User data vs. ecc/edc doesn't match
LBA[000999, 0x003e7], MSF[00:15:24], mode 1

EDIT4: More details here: http://forum.redump.org/post/66206/#p66206

sarami · 2019-01-03 02:24:52

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

ajshell1 wrote:

I'd just like to point out that the most recent versions of DIC I tested (The stable one and test version 20181116 95206) still don't detect the SmartE protection on http://redump.org/disc/38957/.

All logs of your smartE discs, please.

Jackal wrote:

Does your Colin McRae Rally 2 disc also have -59 in one mode?

According to disc.txt, Colin McRae Rally 2.0 and Diablo II: Lord of Destruction have incorrect main-channel(all zero) on LBA 0 if OpCode[0xd8]: SubCode[0] is used.
SubCode[2] and SubCode[8] are no problem. I think this is a bug of plextor and perhaps this occurs on 99 modified SecuROM discs only.

Also I tried 'cdtoimg d8 hacked' for Colin McRae Rally 2.0. 2 files are uploaded. http://www.mediafire.com/file/763drz13a … mr.7z/file

Btw, old plextors have similar issue about drive offsets. These issues occur on all discs.

  PLEXTOR PX-W820T  : +354(subch is 0x02), +355(subch is 0x00)
  PLEXTOR PX-W8220T : +354(subch is 0x02), +355(subch is 0x00)
  PLEXTOR PX-W124S  : +942(subch is 0x02), +943(subch is 0x00)
  PLEXTOR PX-W1210S : +686(subch is 0x08), +98(subch is 0x00)
  PLEXTOR PX-W1610TA: +686(subch is 0x02), +98(subch is 0x00)
  PLEXTOR PX-W2410TA: +686(subch is 0x02), +98(subch is 0x00)
  PLEXTOR PX-320A   : +686(subch is 0x02), +98(subch is 0x00)

Jackal wrote:

I dont know if this also affects discs with +588 offset which should be 0? Many discs have +588.

Sega Saturn discs of +588 offset have a duplicated sector in lead-in. Due to this sector, the offset is shifted by 1 sector. If you worry about it, you can check the lead-in sectors.

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

ajshell1 · 2019-01-03 03:24:15

ajshell1
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2017-09-21
Posts: 378

Logs
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … Disc_1.zip

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … Disc_1.zip

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … ia_USA.zip

sarami · 2019-01-03 04:06:43

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

Test version
20190103 (Windows)
http://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l9 … or_test.7z
20190103 (Linux)
http://www.mediafire.com/file/uw3e03kdk … x_test.tar

fixed: detecting smartE

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

ajshell1 · 2019-01-03 13:27:12

ajshell1
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2017-09-21
Posts: 378

Fable: TLC is dumped correctly with this new update. Thank you.

wiggy2k · 2019-01-08 23:18:07

wiggy2k
Dumper
Offline

From: North East UK
Registered: 2016-06-15
Posts: 1,063

What does this mean ?

LBA[004903, 0x01327]: Track[02]: Invalid sync. Skip descrambling
========== LBA[004903, 0x01327]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0010 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0020 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0030 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
.
.
Repeated.
.
.
.
.

LBA[004977, 0x01371]: Track[02]: Invalid sync. Skip descrambling
========== LBA[004977, 0x01371]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0010 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0020 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0030 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0040 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................

i assume the dump is still good?

Was from this disc: http://forum.redump.org/topic/20520/pcf … chan-kick/

The full logs: https://1fichier.com/?khesqgz83urpjavks6kd

F1ReB4LL · 2019-01-09 11:24:44

F1ReB4LL
Administrator
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-24
Posts: 3,847

wiggy2k wrote:

i assume the dump is still good?

Most likely those are audio pregap sectors that are somehow marked as data in subs, so they are expected to be in data format with the proper headers, but they aren't there, so the tool reports about undescrambleable sectors.

Haldrie · 2019-01-14 22:20:57

Haldrie
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2007-05-16
Posts: 332

Ok not sure if this has been mentioned but I noticed the new /74 flag in the newer version of DIC and was wondering how one would use it exactly to dump the ring data. I tried it just as part of the normal dumping but it didn't seem to do anything. Do I have to use a swap disc or something?

sarami · 2019-01-15 01:51:35

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

Test version
20190115 (Windows)
http://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l9 … or_test.7z
20190115 (Linux)
http://www.mediafire.com/file/uw3e03kdk … x_test.tar

fixed: subs indexes if sub vs. toc is desync http://forum.redump.org/topic/20625/tur … r-lair-us/
fixed: /74 is only used by swap command

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

F1ReB4LL · 2019-01-15 07:28:23

F1ReB4LL
Administrator
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-24
Posts: 3,847

sarami wrote:

fixed: subs indexes if sub vs. toc is desync http://forum.redump.org/topic/20625/tur … r-lair-us/

What was wrong with it and what exactly was fixed?

sarami · 2019-01-15 08:08:17

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

F1ReB4LL wrote:

sarami wrote:
fixed: subs indexes if sub vs. toc is desync http://forum.redump.org/topic/20625/tur … r-lair-us/
What was wrong with it and what exactly was fixed?

INDEX of (Subs indexes).cue and (Subs indexes)_img.cue was incorrect.

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

F1ReB4LL · 2019-01-15 11:30:42

F1ReB4LL
Administrator
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-24
Posts: 3,847

So we need to redump all the desynced PCEs now?

sarami · 2019-01-15 13:02:03

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

2018-05-22 is no problem. 2018-05-23 - 2019-01-03 is bad.

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

F1ReB4LL · 2019-01-15 13:23:02

F1ReB4LL
Administrator
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-24
Posts: 3,847

Track checksums are good, only cues may be wrong? 00:03:05 => 00:03:06 was the only change.

sarami wrote:

2018-05-22 is no problem. 2018-05-23 - 2019-01-03 is bad.

Only http://forum.redump.org/topic/19964/add … ne-ii-usa/ may be affected, then

RevQuixo · 2019-01-15 14:07:47

RevQuixo
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2019-01-04
Posts: 164

F1ReB4LL wrote:

Track checksums are good, only cues may be wrong? 00:03:05 => 00:03:06 was the only change.
sarami wrote:
2018-05-22 is no problem. 2018-05-23 - 2019-01-03 is bad.
Only http://forum.redump.org/topic/19964/add … ne-ii-usa/ may be affected, then

I actually own Final Zone II..dumping now with the new version

sarami · 2019-01-15 17:43:57

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

Thanks test but problems still exist.

LBA[124763, 0x1e75b]: Track[48]: Subchannel & TOC doesn't sync. LBA on TOC[111288, 0x1b2b8], prevIndex[00]
LBA[124763, 0x1e75b]: Track[48]: Index is changed from [00] to [01] [L:966]

LBA[199341, 0x30aad]: Track[55]: Subchannel & TOC doesn't sync. LBA on TOC[189939, 0x2e5f3], prevIndex[00]
LBA[199341, 0x30aad]: Track[55]: Index is changed from [00] to [01] [L:966]

Reuploaded.
http://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l9 … st.7z/file

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

RevQuixo · 2019-01-16 02:42:51

RevQuixo
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2019-01-04
Posts: 164

Redumped both games with the test DIC. Uploaded to my normal spot with test suffix on the zips.

sarami · 2019-01-16 10:14:55

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

Thx, it seems good.

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

Jackal · 2019-01-26 14:44:24

Jackal
Moderator (Retired)
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-23
Posts: 4,132

There's a problem where DIC is only dumping the first layer for double layer games.

Previously, this game was affected: http://redump.org/disc/46022/

And now another disc from Kludge. Attached some logs.

I really hope there aren't any other bad dumps in the db because of this bug

Post's attachments

Medal of Honor Warfighter Disc2.zip 10.21 kb, 15 downloads since 2019-01-26

You don't have the permssions to download the attachments of this post.

sarami · 2019-01-27 10:44:29

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

Jackal wrote:

There's a problem where DIC is only dumping the first layer for double layer games.
Previously, this game was affected: http://redump.org/disc/46022/
And now another disc from Kludge. Attached some logs.
I really hope there aren't any other bad dumps in the db because of this bug

What error occurs?

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

Jackal · 2019-01-28 06:36:56

Jackal
Moderator (Retired)
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-23
Posts: 4,132

There seem to be no errors, it just forgets to dump layer2.

sarami · 2019-01-28 13:42:40

sarami
Dumper
Offline

Registered: 2011-02-20
Posts: 1,745

Jackal wrote:

Previously, this game was affected: http://redump.org/disc/46022/

http://forum.redump.org/topic/20845/ibm … fy-6x-new/
Fallout 4 : https://mega.nz/#F!wc4wnYSa!kpLgUsLXoEPv0BVO9pGUSw

It seems his Fallout 4 is no problem.

Jackal wrote:

There seem to be no errors, it just forgets to dump layer2.

Does it always occur?

DiscImageCreator, UmdImageCreator, Conv2multiBin, bin2wav, PS3Auth (needs login), recompressTo7z_20150109.bat

F1ReB4LL · 2019-01-31 09:17:38

F1ReB4LL
Administrator
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-24
Posts: 3,847

So, there's a common bug in C2 errors detection? Some of the other cases were mentioned here: http://forum.redump.org/topic/18736/jac … re-adding/

Post's attachments

prize fighter- Disc 2 (no errors).zip 6.84 mb, 16 downloads since 2019-01-31

prize fighter-disc 2 (3 errors).zip 6.9 mb, 16 downloads since 2019-01-31

You don't have the permssions to download the attachments of this post.

F1ReB4LL · 2019-01-31 12:23:52

F1ReB4LL
Administrator
Offline

Registered: 2006-12-24
Posts: 3,847

http://forum.redump.org/topic/20666/seg … -shock-us/ -- disc 1 is dumped wrong.

subdump sub wrote:

41 01 01 53 33 50 00 53 35 50 2F 10
41 01 01 53 33 51 00 53 35 51 95 60
01 02 00 00 01 74 00 53 35 52 00 B4
01 02 00 00 01 73 00 53 35 53 77 41
01 02 00 00 01 72 00 53 35 54 AD F7
01 02 00 00 01 71 00 53 35 55 53 04

DIC sub wrote:

41 01 01 53 33 50 00 53 35 50 2F 10
41 01 01 53 33 51 00 53 35 52 A5 03
01 02 00 00 01 74 00 53 35 53 10 95
01 02 00 00 01 73 00 53 35 54 07 A6
01 02 00 00 01 72 00 53 35 55 BD D6
…
01 02 00 00 00 01 00 53 37 51 2D C4
01 02 00 00 00 00 00 53 37 52 B7 F6
01 02 01 00 00 00 00 53 37 52 F0 25
01 02 01 00 00 01 00 53 37 53 4A 55

53:35:51 sector is lost! 53:37:52 sector is doubled! All the sectors between them are altered! Gaps wrong, track sizes wrong!

DiscImageCreator (Page 68 of 141)

Posts: 1,676 to 1,700 of 3,517

1,676 Reply by Jackal 2019-01-02 07:50:15 (edited by Jackal 2019-01-02 07:50:56)

1,677 Reply by ajshell1 2019-01-02 23:16:34 (edited by ajshell1 2019-01-03 01:17:25)

1,678 Reply by sarami 2019-01-03 02:24:52

1,679 Reply by ajshell1 2019-01-03 03:24:15

1,680 Reply by sarami 2019-01-03 04:06:43

1,681 Reply by ajshell1 2019-01-03 13:27:12

1,682 Reply by wiggy2k 2019-01-08 23:18:07 (edited by wiggy2k 2019-01-09 01:45:47)

1,683 Reply by F1ReB4LL 2019-01-09 11:24:44

1,684 Reply by Haldrie 2019-01-14 22:20:57

1,685 Reply by sarami 2019-01-15 01:51:35

1,686 Reply by F1ReB4LL 2019-01-15 07:28:23

1,687 Reply by sarami 2019-01-15 08:08:17

1,688 Reply by F1ReB4LL 2019-01-15 11:30:42

1,689 Reply by sarami 2019-01-15 13:02:03

1,690 Reply by F1ReB4LL 2019-01-15 13:23:02

1,691 Reply by RevQuixo 2019-01-15 14:07:47

1,692 Reply by sarami 2019-01-15 17:43:57

1,693 Reply by RevQuixo 2019-01-16 02:42:51

1,694 Reply by sarami 2019-01-16 10:14:55

1,695 Reply by Jackal 2019-01-26 14:44:24

1,696 Reply by sarami 2019-01-27 10:44:29

1,697 Reply by Jackal 2019-01-28 06:36:56

1,698 Reply by sarami 2019-01-28 13:42:40

1,699 Reply by F1ReB4LL 2019-01-31 09:17:38

1,700 Reply by F1ReB4LL 2019-01-31 12:23:52

Posts: 1,676 to 1,700 of 3,517