Search options (Page 11 of 56)

2021-06-24 14:42:08

gmipf wrote:

OK, I will try burning an XGD3 iso and use it as the trap disc. Layerbreak the burn is 2133520 I think? Should I burn the DVD+R DL as booktype DVD-ROM or as normal?
EDIT: 2133520 isn't even possible on DVD+R DL? I think I need a burner with BurnerMAX feature for this?

Ah, I said there is no disc that can burn XGD3. If you dump it, use XBOX360 drive. Kreon drive also can dump it without SSv2.

Neon Beast wrote:

It's the Chinese release of Eraser Turnabout, I can't find any link for you, unfortunately. So correctness between dumps cannot be verified as of now?

As you say, the last 4 sectors are mastering error, but in relation to the other error sectors, I'm not sure which result of the tool is correct.

2021-06-24 02:09:55

gmipf wrote:

I can't find any pressed disc as big as 4267015.

Yes. XGD3 can dump by the trap disc method in theory, but there is not a blank disc that can dump it.

2021-06-23 15:24:57

Neon Beast wrote:

I have dumped a disc with some errors which I believe are mastering errors since this publisher's discs always have some

Tell me the correct title and the link of amazon or eBay, please.

2021-06-22 13:41:08

CloneCD wrote:

I 15:48:19 Fast Error Skip: Yes

Can you set "Fast Error Skip" to "No"?

2021-06-16 04:24:04

max wrote:

There was a message regarding sectors which lack ECC though, so I guess it would be normal to see no errors for those sectors because they couldn't be checked.

The 4th sector from the last does not change the mode.

LBA[326231, 0x4fa57], MSF[72:31:56], mode 2 form 1, SubHeader[1](FileNum[00]), [2](ChannelNum[00]), [3](Submode[00])[NoEOF, Form 1], [4](CodingInfo[00])[]
LBA[326232, 0x4fa58], MSF[72:31:57], mode 2 form 1, SubHeader[1](FileNum[00]), [2](ChannelNum[00]), [3](Submode[00])[NoEOF, Form 1], [4](CodingInfo[00])[]
LBA[326233, 0x4fa59], MSF[72:31:58], mode 2 form 1, SubHeader[1](FileNum[00]), [2](ChannelNum[00]), [3](Submode[00])[NoEOF, Form 1], [4](CodingInfo[00])[]
LBA[326234, 0x4fa5a], MSF[72:31:59], mode 2 form 1, SubHeader[1](FileNum[00]), [2](ChannelNum[00]), [3](Submode[00])[NoEOF, Form 1], [4](CodingInfo[00])[]
LBA[326235, 0x4fa5b], MSF[72:31:60], mode 2 form 1, SubHeader[1](FileNum[00]), [2](ChannelNum[00]), [3](Submode[00])[NoEOF, Form 1], [4](CodingInfo[00])[]
[INFO] Number of sector(s) where EDC doesn't exist: 300
Total errors: 0
Total warnings: 0

2021-06-14 18:14:26

RibShark wrote:

So which dump is correct?

Asus.

RibShark wrote:

Is this a plextor bug

I think so.

RibShark wrote:

can it be resolved?

It's impossible for me. If this is firmware problem, it might be valid to downgrade it.

2021-06-14 17:50:07

RibShark wrote:

The sectors appear to have no sync when dumped with the Plextor.

Plextor sometimes shifts some bytes when dumps the disc.

0900 : 22 F4 AD 60 D8 7A 5A DE  10 9D 21 4F 95 FC 68 16   "..`.zZ...!O..h.
0910 : 1F 18 9A 77 2D 24 68 9A  00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF   ...w-$h.........
0920 : FF FF FF 00 29 A6 18 61  F6 D7 FC E1 79 F7 96 F9   ....)..a....y...
LBA[127818, 0x1f34a]: Track[01]: Invalid sync. Skip descrambling
========== LBA[127818, 0x1f34a]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 52 FD 0F 7E 76 9F 69 28  24 1E 99 88 65 66 A1 AA   R..~v.i($...ef..
0010 : F2 7F 0A E0 0F 48 0C 36  8A 16 EF 0E C2 04 59 83   .....H.6......Y.

2021-06-13 14:37:57

Uploaded.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file

This subRtoW is rare. Not to detect as suberror.

========== OpCode[0xd8]: SubCode[2]: Check Drive + CD offset ==========
========== LBA[000000, 0000000]: Sub Channel ==========
      +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B
    P FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
    Q 41 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 28 32
    R 7F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
    S 7F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
    T 7F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
    U 7F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
    V 7F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
    W 7F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

2021-06-11 15:43:46

user7 wrote:

Maddog believes he knows what the issue is - "I think there's some disagreement between where subs say the data should be and where TOC says the data should be."

LBA[002173, 0x0087d]: Track[01]: Invalid mode. 
========== LBA[002173, 0x0087d]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF  FF FF FF 00 01 B0 73 82   ..............s.

0910 : 5C 7A B9 E3 32 C9 D5 96  DF 2E D8 1C 5A 89 FB 26   \z..2.......Z..&
0920 : C3 5A D1 FB 1C 43 49 F1  F6 C4 46 D3 72 DD E5 99   .Z...CI...F.r...
LBA[002174, 0x0087e]: Track[01]: Invalid mode. Invalid reserved byte. Skip descrambling
========== LBA[002174, 0x0087e]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF  FF FF FF 00 01 B0 74 A2   ..............t.
0010 : 00 28 00 1E 80 08 60 06  A8 02 FE 81 80 60 60 28   .(....`......``(

0910 : DD 98 DD 98 DD C9 DD 98  DD 98 DD 98 5A 89 DD 98   ............Z...
0920 : DD 98 DD 98 1C 43 DD 98  DD 98 DD 98 A0 1D DD 98   .....C..........
LBA[002175, 0x0087f]: Track[01]: Invalid sync. Skip descrambling
========== LBA[002175, 0x0087f]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : DD 98 DD 98 FF FF DD 98  DD 98 DD 98 01 B1 DD 98   ................
0010 : 00 FF FF FF FF 4F FF FF  FF FF FF 00 80 60 00 C2   .....O.......`..
0020 : 00 28 00 1E 68 66 60 06  A8 02 FE 81 80 3A 60 28   .(..hf`......:`(

0920 : 5C 7A B9 E3 32 C9 D5 96  DF 2E D8 1C 5A 89 FB 26   \z..2.......Z..&
LBA[002176, 0x00880]: Track[01]: Invalid sync. Skip descrambling
========== LBA[002176, 0x00880]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : C3 5A D1 FB 1C 43 49 F1  F6 C4 46 D3 72 DD E5 99   .Z...CI...F.r...
0010 : 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF  FF FF FF 00 01 B1 01 E2   ................
0020 : 00 28 00 1E 80 08 60 06  A8 02 FE 81 80 60 60 28   .(....`......``(

LBA 2174 has 2352+16 bytes? Due to this sector LBA 2175 ... last are all shifted.
If possible, try to dump other drives (plextor CD drive or 0xF1 drive of ASUS firmware).

2021-06-04 02:56:44

RevQuixo wrote:

Getting a C2 error now at the transition of a session.

018072 is the lead-out sector. No problem if /c2 do not use for your disc.

2021-06-03 17:42:32

RevQuixo wrote:

Got further this time (past the initial error) but new issue:
[ERROR] This program doesn't support to dump the multi-session disc by the plextor CD Drive

See below.
https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … /issues/41

2021-06-03 14:26:45

RevQuixo wrote:

Here you go.

Uploaded.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file
Your disc has two 0xb0.

========== FULL TOC (Binary) ==========
========== LBA[000000, 0000000]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 00 9C 01 02 01 10 00 A0  00 00 00 00 01 00 00 01   ................
0010 : 10 00 A1 00 00 00 00 02  00 00 01 10 00 A2 00 00   ................
0020 : 00 00 02 20 48 01 10 00  01 00 00 00 00 00 02 00   ... H...........
0030 : 01 10 00 02 00 00 00 00  02 14 23 01 50 00 B0 05   ..........#.P...
0040 : 02 48 02 4F 3B 47 01 50  00 C0 A0 00 30 00 61 1A   .H.O;G.P....0.a.
0050 : 42 02 10 00 A0 00 00 00  00 03 00 00 02 10 00 A1   B...............
0060 : 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 02  10 00 A2 00 00 00 00 05   ................
0070 : 1F 0B 02 10 00 03 00 00  00 00 05 04 48 02 10 00   ............H...
0080 : 04 00 00 00 00 05 0F 35  02 10 00 05 00 00 00 00   .......5........
0090 : 05 19 0D 02 50 00 B0 FF  FF FF 01 4F 3B 47 00 00   ....P......O;G..

MSF of the 1st 0xb0 had been overwritten by the MSF of 2nd 0xb0. I fixed it.

F1ReB4LL wrote:

Why does C2 rereading give different results every time?

I answered about it in the past.
http://forum.redump.org/post/57771/#p57771
http://forum.redump.org/post/70466/#p70466

2021-06-02 14:34:06

RevQuixo wrote:

Here are the logs for Frog Feast (Jag CD homebrew on CDR). It fails pretty early on.

https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file
- added: output FULLTOC (Binary) to _maininfo.txt for debug
like this

========== FULL TOC (Binary) ==========
========== LBA[000000, 0000000]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 00 4F 01 01 01 14 00 A0  00 00 00 00 01 20 00 01   .O........... ..
0010 : 14 00 A1 00 00 00 00 01  00 00 01 14 00 A2 00 00   ................
0020 : 00 00 02 06 44 01 14 00  01 00 00 00 00 00 02 00   ....D...........
0030 : 01 54 00 B0 04 24 44 03  4F 3B 4A 01 54 00 C0 46   .T...$D.O;J.T..F
0040 : 00 9E 00 61 22 17 01 54  00 C1 48 58 B8 00 00 00   ...a"..T..HX....
0050 : 00 00 00 00

Please re-upload logs.

2021-06-01 05:44:13

https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … g/20210601
*2021-06-01
- added: output IMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY
- added: output IMAGE_RESOURCE_DIRECTORY
- changed: output IMAGE_IMPORT_DIRECTORY
- changed: 0x83 ... 0x8f do not affect the cue sheet if crc is bad, so CD-TEXT output is permitted.
- fixed: check c2 error "00 f0 f0 f0 00 00 00 0f 0f 0f 00"
- fixed: SubQ adr6
- improved: multi sector reading of the 0xf1 drive

2021-05-31 03:43:42

NovaAurora wrote:

LoStraniero pointed me here.
Latest DIC included with MPF, only one sector being detected for SecuROM 4.84.76. Apparently it's supposed to have more than that. Here's the logs, I was told to attach those.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … T_logs.zip

Subchannel is shifted throughout all sectors.

LBA[005000, 0x01388]: Track[01]: SubQ Reread [crc16 unmatch] -> NG. Fix manually
========== LBA[005000, 0x01388]: Sub Channel ==========
      +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B
    P 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    Q 41 01 01 01 06 49 00 01 08 49 A5 B0
    R 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    S 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    T 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    U 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    V 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
LBA[005000, 0x01388]: Track[01]: SubQ[19-21]:PrevAbs[5149, 01:08:49], Abs[5149, 01:08:49] -> [5150, 01:08:50] But this sector may be the intentional error of AMSF. see _subinfo.txt
LBA[005001, 0x01389]: Track[01]: SubQ Reread [crc16 unmatch] -> NG. Fix manually
========== LBA[005001, 0x01389]: Sub Channel ==========
      +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B
    P 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    Q 41 01 01 21 06 50 00 05 08 50 0A 8F
    R 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    S 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    T 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    U 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    V 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
LBA[005001, 0x01389]: Track[01]: SubQ[15-17]:PrevRel[4999, 01:06:49], Rel[95000, 21:06:50] -> [5000, 01:06:50], [L:1256] But this sector may be the intentional error of RMSF. see _subinfo.txt
LBA[005001, 0x01389]: Track[01]: SubQ[19-21]:PrevAbs[5150, 01:08:50], Abs[23150, 05:08:50] -> [5151, 01:08:51] But this sector may be the intentional error of AMSF. see _subinfo.txt

Disc problem?

RevQuixo wrote:

Getting this error on a JagCD homebrew title:

Logs, please.

nightson wrote:

As you can see in the marked sections, some lines seem to be out of place. Is this a bug of DIC or the > redirect command?

I also comfirmed it. I tried to add sleep function, but it was in vain.

nightson wrote:

Could you add the option to automatically saves the final console output to a log file when dumping is completed?

It's difficult. Use copy & paste to a text file manually, or press Alt + PrtSc and then save as .png or .jpg

user7 wrote:

Arrington redumped mine, but different hashes. can you have a look at his logs? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UcoQAu … sp=sharing
Same ring codes

Total errors are different.

2021-05-24 14:49:48

NovaAurora wrote:

Latest DIC included with MPF, only one sector being detected for SecuROM 4.84.76. Apparently it's supposed to have more than that. Here's the logs, I was told to attach those.

Do you have other SecuROM discs? I hope you dump them.

2021-05-18 11:01:22

Jackal wrote:

@sarami any theory on why the offset might be shifted with 1 sample?

reentrant wrote:

Probably different master disc.

I think so, too.

Jackal wrote:

edit: And here another ASUS dump: http://forum.redump.org/post/89943/#p89943 where all tracks match this dump http://redump.org/disc/71231/ except the last track. Could it be cut off data? Or just a different pressing?

It seems these last 24 bytes are obtained.

0910 : FB FF FE FF FA FF FD FF  FB FF FC FF FB FF FD FF   ................
0920 : FB FF FB FF FA FF FC FF  FA FF FC FF F9 FF FB FF   ................
========== Cached Main Channel [Lead-out] ==========
========== LBA[245056, 0x3bd40]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : F9 FF F9 FF F9 FF FB FF  F6 FF FA FF F6 FF F9 FF   ................
0010 : F7 FF F8 FF F6 FF F9 FF  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0020 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
0030 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................

Which byte of sector is different?

2021-05-18 03:30:03

reentrant wrote:

IMHO audio tracks made with Asus and positive offset discs should be temp banned unless fully resolved

Please test by the latest version. https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file

2021-05-14 13:58:44

- improved: multi sector reading of the 0xf1 drive
https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file
added argument in /mr

Retry 20 times

DiscImageCreator.exe cd f E:\!redump\zzz.bin 0 /c2 /mr 20

Retry 100 times

DiscImageCreator.exe cd f E:\!redump\zzz.bin 0 /c2 /mr 100

Default retry times are 50.

DiscImageCreator.exe cd f E:\!redump\zzz.bin 0 /c2 /mr

2021-05-07 16:45:37

LoStraniero91 wrote:

First log is for Might & Magic VI and with PCem it acts just like other old SecuROM games: it just hangs when launching it.

1. What is the region? GER, JPN, KOR, and USA don't have the protection. http://redump.org/discs/system/pc/letter/m/?page=3
2. How about other emulators or virtual machines (Virtual Box, VMware)?

2021-05-07 03:14:32

LoStraniero91 wrote:

without the intentional SecuROM error.

Yes, there is not SecuROM error in _subError.txt. Probably, it is deactivated.

2021-05-04 07:18:44

rosewood wrote:

sarami wrote:
This is the last (perhaps).
https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file
Let's hope so. This title has been dumped more often than anything else
test7.7z

Ok. Adr6 has been fixed. Thanks for all testing.

2021-05-04 04:22:15

rosewood wrote:

sarami wrote:
sarami wrote:
But the fixed sub is not set correctly...
Sorry, still buggy.
Uploaded. https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file
Next: test6.7z

This is the last (perhaps).
https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file

2021-05-03 02:34:16

sarami wrote:

But the fixed sub is not set correctly...

Sorry, still buggy.
Uploaded. https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file

2021-05-02 11:33:59

rosewood wrote:

sarami wrote:
BCD did not matter...
Fixed again.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file
Next: test4.7z

The subchannel was fixed as I expected.

LBA[011100, 0x02b5c]: Track[01]: SubQ[13-19]:Adr6[cf3cf0cff0fbf000] -> [cf3cf0cff0fff000]

But the fixed sub is not set correctly...

LBA[011100, 0x02b5c]: P[00], Q[46d542f21700fbf00000bccb]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Unknown Data    [d542f21700fbf000], AMSF[     :00]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]

Re-uploaded.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/eq80y20l … st.7z/file

Aringon wrote:

If you're trying to buy a copy of the disc to try yourself, grab the one without the "Fisher-Price New!" logo on the case. A lot of sellers aren't courteous enough to take photos of the disc so you'll likely need to get a sealed copy or something to be sure.

Please write down and tell me amazon or ebay link of the disc.

Common Disc Info:
    Title: 
    Media Type: CD-ROM
    Region: 
    Languages:
    Disc Serial:

    Ringcode Information:
        Data Side Mastering Code (laser branded/etched):
        Data Side Mastering SID Code:
        Data Side Toolstamp or Mastering Code (engraved/stamped): 
        Data Side Mould SID Code:
        Data Side Additional Mould:
        Label Side Mould SID Code:
        Label Side Additional Mould: 
    Barcode:

Search options (Page 11 of 56)

Posts found: 251 to 275 of 1,390

251 Reply by sarami 2021-06-24 14:42:08

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

252 Reply by sarami 2021-06-24 02:09:55

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

253 Reply by sarami 2021-06-23 15:24:57

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

254 Reply by sarami 2021-06-22 13:41:08

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

255 Reply by sarami 2021-06-16 04:24:04

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

256 Reply by sarami 2021-06-14 18:14:26

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

257 Reply by sarami 2021-06-14 17:50:07

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

258 Reply by sarami 2021-06-13 14:37:57

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

259 Reply by sarami 2021-06-11 15:43:46

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

260 Reply by sarami 2021-06-04 02:56:44

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

261 Reply by sarami 2021-06-03 17:42:32

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

262 Reply by sarami 2021-06-03 14:26:45

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

263 Reply by sarami 2021-06-02 14:34:06

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

264 Reply by sarami 2021-06-01 05:44:13

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

265 Reply by sarami 2021-05-31 03:43:42

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

266 Reply by sarami 2021-05-24 14:49:48

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

267 Reply by sarami 2021-05-18 11:01:22

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

268 Reply by sarami 2021-05-18 03:30:03

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

269 Reply by sarami 2021-05-14 13:58:44

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

270 Reply by sarami 2021-05-07 16:45:37

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

271 Reply by sarami 2021-05-07 03:14:32

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

272 Reply by sarami 2021-05-04 07:18:44

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

273 Reply by sarami 2021-05-04 04:22:15

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

274 Reply by sarami 2021-05-03 02:34:16

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

275 Reply by sarami 2021-05-02 11:33:59

Re: DiscImageCreator (3,521 replies, posted in General discussion)

Posts found: 251 to 275 of 1,390