http://redump.org/disc/5256
http://redump.org/disc/41608

Since there has only been one Rev C and Rev D dump so far, there is no need to have "(32M)" and "(41M)" in the datname

Before this gets fixed, it needs to be checked whether TOSEC or other datting groups are aware of Alts with these revisions - that may be why these are currently datted that way.

In addition, the Saturn dat structure is a bit unique and has some quirks / conventions that may or may not match exactly what is done with other systems.

Same thing with
http://redump.org/disc/22723
http://redump.org/disc/36362

Same with
http://redump.org/disc/42397
http://redump.org/disc/62961

Same for
http://redump.org/disc/53088
http://redump.org/disc/26716

Same for
http://redump.org/disc/59759

Same for
http://redump.org/disc/25476

Same for
http://redump.org/disc/53075
http://redump.org/disc/34221

Same with
http://redump.org/disc/62433

Same with
http://redump.org/disc/19680

Same with
http://redump.org/disc/25481

Same with
http://redump.org/disc/45038
http://redump.org/disc/33119

Again, we're aware of these, older systems like Saturn have unique dat names rules, and also depend on non-redump dumps.

Same with
http://redump.org/disc/40447

16 (edited by Ganou 2025-12-27 15:28:02)

Deterous wrote:

Again, we're aware of these, older systems like Saturn have unique dat names rules, and also depend on non-redump dumps.

Yeah, I'm just trying to reference them all here and now, so that if something is changed, you will not have to browse the whole saturn database

No need here, sorry. Thanks anyway