Hi, if you are still interested get your password by using the password request form (see login) and you are in smile

Thanks for your contribution, GreyRogue. If you want to join the project let me know smile

1,053

(4 replies, posted in News)

I don't see much usage of updating it periodicaly. I was adding some own features to the previous versions and everytime you update to a new version you have to re-add your code again and again.

Maybe i will bring it up to the latest version somewhen during this year, need to read all the update notes to see what is new.

If that was past Nov 2/3 then it has gone

I would say a clean subchannel dump is required >> http://forum.redump.org/topic/14725/

Cuesheet is a media descriptor file and contains a "part" of disc information which is to be found in subchannel dump too.

Mostly because a clean subchannel dump is required.

1,057

(2 replies, posted in General discussion)

In addition to timezones it might also have summer/winter daytime saving differences.

In which cases can it be any useful to have the timestamps static?

1,058

(3,497 replies, posted in General discussion)

fuzzball wrote:

Is DIC supports DVD-9?
I can not dump the DVD-Video.

It should be supported. The dvd might have a copy protection. You may need to play the dvd in a player for a few seconds (VLC player).

1,059

(2 replies, posted in General discussion)

it is rather the quality of these media, and in addition shorter pins/lands of GD-ROM's high density areas.

ZoomBoppo wrote:
RVL-SBLE-USA-B0

This one.

Account created, welcome ))

Hi.

The formatting is fine, the only thing i don't seem to see are the disc serials, look at the disc label prints.

Also, still want to get an account?

1,062

(3 replies, posted in Guests & account requests)

You can have an account, Magik. If no email received, just request a new password upon login page.

yeah, for this particular case both write offsets are equal -174

a new post with ice.log files would be nice, please mention your drive read offset there and put all logs into an archive as attachment.

Yes, for ice log:

tossEAC wrote:

Combined offset (samples) : -168

that value - (drive read offset from drive which was used for dumping with ice)

Which is then the High Density Area (HDA) offset.

I mean, it was not a reference for naming. I was going to download that file and check the readme contents and what not. There should be some reference on the disc itself. Maybe you can check it by yourself, see readme.txt or version file or something, maybe pdf file, etc.


Maybe the naming could be: "CD Gamer: PC Gamer CD-ROM Issue 65: January 1999"

Still need a confirmation!

I will leave an url here just for further investigations:

https://archive.org/details/CD_Gamer_Is … nuary_1999



Note:
Picture above is for 65b, the url is for 65A

1,067

(9 replies, posted in General discussion)

edcchhk returns a correct amount of ERRORS, just look for that line and not for total.

CDmage (at least the last version i was ever using) returns any "errors" you can ever have: moddified subheaders, ECC/EDC error etc. Where moddified subheaders and ECC/EDC mismatch is not an actual ERROR and should not be included into final errors count.

case1 = 1
case2 = 0

1,068

(7 replies, posted in General discussion)

I have seen people talking about it, but nobody was ever able to get an answer on how the dumpers managed to dump those.

I am assuming it does not work at all.

1,069

(6 replies, posted in General discussion)

tossEAC, if you do the redumps please keep cleanrip's dumping logs too, in order to be able to assign the bca data to the right disc later. Thanks.

1,070

(6 replies, posted in General discussion)

Only if you are able to afford your free time for that, tossEAC smile

1,071

(7 replies, posted in General discussion)

I am pretty sure its a gamecube optical media and not wii optical media, therefore it is currently in a wrong system, and it has the same mastering layer structure and you won't be able to dump it, tossEAC.

I will hide this disc, as it is obviously undumpable, at least at this point.

http://redump.org/disc/13687/

1,072

(3 replies, posted in Guests & account requests)

If you don't get an email notification please request a new password for your account, see login form. Formatting is fine, please resubmit these two dumps in "dumps" subforum.

Hi, if you want your dumps to be added to the database please provide more information:
disc title,
disc serial,
full matrix,
bca (cleanrip output, optional)
edition,
system (wii or gamecube)

I didn't really know what Dremora was going to do. I probably just had a similar thought, because i didn't like the disc based structure, it does not preserve the real release contents, everything is more or less mixed into a single entry right now.

ALL binary variations would simply be linked to the same package (as binary variations), as long as the package has the same visual contents, there is not much else to do.

If a package would contain a disc with different label print, misprint or whatever it would qualify for a new package, you know what i mean?

Though, this preservation methode is way to complex. One cannot really confirm a package contents if it was an unsealed second hand purchase, resellers do not bother what they sell as long as they get rid of stuff, theirfore they mix everything together to get a "complete" set.

Back the other days I was working on an (in my opinion) improved database structure, while the current database structure is based on DISC information, I thought it would be more clear to make it PACKET / REVISION based. The disc information would still remain same, just assigned in an other way to a packet. Which to be honest would make it a little bit difficult in case of discs with unknown release source.

Anyways, the whole project has become dead after a powerfailure on my machine and the entire hdd, which was encrypted, has gone unreadable, and it didn't just contain the redump web project, there was my entire project source collection i ever was working on! I think you only can imagine how bad it was for me.

I still have this hdd and made a clone of it in case i can restore the decryption key one day, but there is no real much hope.

The verification form is on my todo list, i know, it should make the entire verification process a lot faster and easier, there is however a big BUT...
a) the disc matrix still has to be reviewed manually, mainly because in most cases dumpers do not separate it into cells.
b) there can be typos basically in every submission.
c) the disc source, region, languages, and several other submission categories can be either wrong or unknown.
d) logs etc. have to be provided and be in a specifical default form.

If you can work out a flawless template how it should look like and be reliable i will gladly bring it into a code format.

Cheers smile