Welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Redump Forum → Posts by iR0b0t
Welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
Welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
Welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
Note:
"jj1dom's sd ripper" may not be accepted as a dumping device, please see if you can dump it with methods we currently accept.
http://forum.redump.org/topic/2620/
or
http://wiki.redump.org/index.php?title=Sega_Dreamcast
Welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
Welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
Hi, and welcome!
obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
That would only be useful if you wanted to sort them by date modified on your machine. I can see your idea behind that. The thing is, the database does not, or only support it partially. In the current state the exact modification time on cuesheet data is not given, you can only track the latest disc entry modification as a whole.
I was planning to add an extra datetime for cuesheet modifications, which would cross your idea. As soon as my plan is realised i can see what i can do regarding your idea.
Hi, and welcome!
obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
I was told by F1ReB4LL to add them, so I guess he knows more.
Both were already available for new disc submissions.
Is that a request for a second account?
You're welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
A NOTE: please make sure not to post any download links for images.
You're welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
You're welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
I think in this case its indeed "PopoloCrois", cover and ingame main menu are the same. The "O"s look smaller because they have thinner borders on top and bottom than other letters. If you zoom in you will notice it better, the border pixels will be on the same line.
Though, not sure if a Kingdom's name should be "PopoloCrois" in one case and "PoPoLoCrois" in other cases.
iR0b0t wrote:a) Dump with "/c2 /q" parameters may be good now, i have to recheck my dump with trap disc method before i can approve it.
LBA[321134, 0x4e66e]: Track[01]: Invalid mode. ========== LBA[321134, 0x4e66e]: Main Channel ========== +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F 0000 : 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 00 70 A3 59 82 ............p.Y.
The scrambled mode is 0x62 but this sector is 0x82. Can IsoBuster read this sector?
No, isobuster cannot read it. Last TWO sectors are erroneous.
I have used audio trap disc and redumped this disc, it is matching with --- a) Dump with "/c2 /q" parameters.
I will recheck --- b) Dump with "/c2 /q /p" parameters --- later again.
a) Dump with "/c2 /q" parameters may be good now, i have to recheck my dump with trap disc method before i can approve it.
b) Dump with "/c2 /q /p" parameters looks shifted by several sectors, i have not counted how many (bin segment in logs).
sarami, it looks a little better now, but still weird.
Shall i maybe move all the correspondences concerning this disc to an extra topic? [redump.org/disc/29657/]
Also, i think, i don't have to run an extra dump with /raw switch, as it doesn't do anything extra, or do you need it!?
I probably don't have to describe what i see from that dump, you make your own overview anyways. I have included some chunks of main channel data for you.
I have used the latest dic test version for this.
/c2 /q no anomalies
/c2 /q /p no anomalies
/c2 /q /raw does exactly the same thing as "/c2 /q" does, there is no leadin, no leadout, no pregap data
/raw switch doesn't do anything, confirmed.
EDIT:
i also used the latest stable build again and this time it is just fine, i don't know what happended before, i did not use any other switches than this time and output was shifted last time.
You're welcome, please obtain your password here.
(also check the spam folder in case there will be no message in your inbox)
Okay, thank you guys.
Redump Forum → Posts by iR0b0t
Powered by PunBB 1.4.4, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 6 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.