1,176 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

added log. please retest.

EDIT:
- fixed: DirectoryRecord

Go to forum: General discussion

1,177 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

- added: old scsi drive
- fixed: check arg
- fixed: some bug

Go to forum: General discussion

1,178 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

small update.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,179 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

- added: coded about codelock (but don't test it enough)
- fixed: audio command (because couldn't get at LBA -75)

Go to forum: General discussion

1,180 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

- fixed: Output volume descriptor for CDI (caesar's boxing)

iR0b0t wrote:

Could you also maybe add an additional cuesheet file with the real track type for database purposes only if disc is a CDI title?

sorry, I can't understand the need a little.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,181 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t wrote:

sarami, could you check this up please > https://www.mediafire.com/?4cdtbp41ec1xp6g

The logs' contents differ in there.

EdcEcc reports last sector as:

LBA[026938, 0x0693a], mode 1 Reserved byte doesn't zero.

- added: message for audio or scrambled or corrupt sector

iR0b0t wrote:

mainError log says:

LBA[026939, 0x0693b], Track[01]: This sector is data, but a header doesn't exist
LBA[026940, 0x0693c], Track[01]: This sector is data, but a header doesn't exist
LBA[026941, 0x0693d], Track[01]: This sector is data, but a header doesn't exist

coded but don't test.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,182 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

MrX_Cuci wrote:

Sometimes I get this error with certain disc:

Not everytime?

I uploaded 0820ver. for error log. plz retest.
and this

If you report a bug. Could you test the latest test version and tell me the following. (I don't support a old ver.)
- all created file except bin, img, scm
- disc title and region

Go to forum: General discussion

1,183 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

MrX_Cuci wrote:

Should be up in 3 min.

SubDump: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/355 … ubDump.zip
DIC: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/355 … IL2DIC.zip
CloneCD: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/355 … loneCD.zip

It seems that the error sector of clonecd sub isn't update. So I think subdump and dic sub is correct.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,184 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

MrX_Cuci wrote:

Should the DIC sub match CloneCD sub for a protected disc? (SafeDisc 2.40.010 in this case) CCD and IMG files match, but SUB does not.

plz upload dic, clonecd, and subdump sub.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,185 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

Warrior wrote:

sarami is it possible to open the source to DIC so others can port it to other OS's?

I have a few acquaintances who wish to dump and only use Linux.

No problem as far as obey the license.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,186 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

MrX_Cuci wrote:

Is this disc usefull to you or do you need a different one? http://redump.org/disc/31579/ Also check this out: http://gamecopyworld.com/games/pc_breakneck.shtml In ISObuster the file CD.IDX is 546,99 MB. The total disc size is almost 1GB (if counted manually)

Thank's but I don't have this protect disc yet. plz wait..

axisleon wrote:

Report 2015.08.03
FXNHE618 and FXHUD401 are ok.
When dump FXNHE401 -- 卒業ＩＩＦＸ, application crash. (before .ccd file made)
There are some log below, others all 0 bytes.

AppVersion
        x86, AnsiBuild, Aug  4 2014 03:55:11

Thank's but could you test these in latest test version.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,187 Reply by sarami

(4 replies, posted in General discussion)

MigaMan wrote:

So what is the current procedure for dumping/verifying the older systems such as Turbo Duo, Sega CD, etc.?

If you can read and edit a batch file, This may be useful...
http://www.mediafire.com/download/4lfcg … teImage.7z

Go to forum: General discussion

1,188 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

uploaded 20150812 test ver.

MrX_Cuci wrote:

do you know which drives works best with newer protections?

I don't know because I don't have enough protect disc to test and I recommend a drive only plextor made in Shinano Kenshi.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,189 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

sarami wrote:
iR0b0t wrote:

CodeLock   http://redump.org/discs/quicksearch/cod … ction/only

and other discs which use intentional c2 errors in combination with any other protections.

You could set this custom command in priority to EccEdc, which is "/rc" i think.

I don't have these protect disc. plz wait.

I bought this. http://redump.org/disc/31708/
and I found it this protect has "icd*" text in IMAGE_SECTION_HEADER of the EXE file. (by PoxyLok http://gf.wiretarget.com/copylok.htm

Go to forum: General discussion

1,190 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t, what kind of USB do you connect your 760a using?

Go to forum: General discussion

1,191 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

Beginning from LBA 2120 it does not show any reading status messages and is only updating LBA numbers++

I don't yet understand why the data which I expected can't acquire even though a reading error doesn't happen...
I need more time to investigate the cause.

Besides of this, what can cause LBA number being shifted by 2 ?
Creating img (LBA)   2119/327442[F:ProcessReadCD][L:192] OperationCode: 0xd8
LBA[002121, 0x00849] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]

I confirmed it, I'll fix it by next update.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,192 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

Thanks.

dic_PX-760A_mainError.txt of rc 30.rar wrote:

===================== Main Channel, LBA[002121, 0x00849] ======================
              +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
      0(   0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b0 20 61
LBA[002121, 0x00849] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002121, 0x00849] ======================
              +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
      0(   0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b0 21 61
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002406, 0x00966] ======================
              +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
      0(   0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b4 05 61
LBA[002406, 0x00966] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002406, 0x00966] ======================
              +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
      0(   0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b4 06 61

dic_PX-760A_EdcEcc.txt of rc 30.rar wrote:

LBA[002120, 0x00848], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002121, 0x00849], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002122, 0x0084a], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002123, 0x0084b], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002124, 0x0084c], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002125, 0x0084d], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
:
:
LBA[002193, 0x00891], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002194, 0x00892], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55

A reading error doesn't seem to happen from 2122 to 2194 but replaced 0x55.
How does the error or message show from 2122 to 2194 on the console?

Go to forum: General discussion

1,193 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

Don't know the cause...
- added: mainlog
- changed: log file name
If you have time, could you test by /rc 20, 30, 60

Go to forum: General discussion

1,194 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t wrote:

2105-2196
2405-2496
...
have the same pattern.
They begin with an incomplete sector (due to combined offset of +18 in this case),
the next sector has a repeated sector ID, i will make an example of the first group:
2105-2196
Sector 2105 has a correct header ID.
Sector 2106 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2105.
Sector 2107 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2106.
...
Sector 2121 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2120.
Beginning by sector 2121 and ending at sector 2196 all sectors have a repeated sector ID from sector 2120.
The last sector of this group = 2196 is not completelly replaced by 0x55.

Probably this problem is fixed. (But 2105, 2405, 2778... is replaced yet)

iR0b0t wrote:

I don't want to dump it again just yet, because this disc took me 11 hours to dump.

        /rc     If read error, continue reading and ignore c2 error on specific
                sector (Only CD)
                        For LaserLock, RingPROTECH, safedisc, smartE
                        val     timeout value (default: 60)

If you reduce a ripping time, you should set "timeout value" (60 is 60sec=1min) If you set 30, ripping time will be reduced about 1/2, if you set 15, about 1/4.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,195 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

axisleon wrote:

Source: NEC PCFX Der Langrisser FXNHE618

Thank you.
- added: check PCFX sector

iR0b0t wrote:

Those sectors should not have been replaced i think.

iR0b0t wrote:

You can identify laserlock discs by a file called "LASERLOK.IN", but i think you already have it set.

Your log

Detected [LASERLOK.IN], Skip error from 337 to 10336

I have thought that those error sector should be replaced at 0x55.
If you right, it's difficult for me to recognize whether it is an error sector...

Go to forum: General discussion

1,196 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t wrote:

sarami, it should be okay now for SafeDisc 3.15.XXX

My disc does return 1 error more, but its due to a scratch.

I do believe this issue is fixed now, thanks for that.

Thanks test. Uploaded test version.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,197 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

tossEAC wrote:

QQ: is the SH-D162C supported for GDRom dumping?

I don't know because I don't have this drive...

MrX_Cuci wrote:

When ripping a data DVD I get this in the command line windows: (PX-708A)

http://www.13thmonkey.org/documentation … c3r10g.pdf
According to this pdf, format 02 means the thing that returns the Disc Key obfuscated by using a Bus Key.

SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-6f-02, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - COPY PROTECTION KEY EXCHANGE
 FAILURE - KEY NOT ESTABLISHED
Failure - Format 02

This error means the thing that can't get disc key because KEY NOT ESTABLISHED.

format 03 means the thing that returns the BCA(Burst Cutting Area) information on DVD media.

[F:ReadDVDStructure][L:360] OperationCode: 0xad
ScsiStatus: 02, CHECK_CONDITION
SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-24-00, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - INVALID FIELD IN CDB
Failure - Format 03

This error means the thing that your drive doesn't support getting BCA.

[F:ReadDVD][L:53] OperationCode: 0xa8
ScsiStatus: 02, CHECK_CONDITION
SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-24-00, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - INVALID FIELD IN CDB
This drive doesn't support streaming

I'll omit this streaming bit in the future because it isn't necessary.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,198 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t wrote:

There is another SafeDisc game which doesn't work as expected, i guess it will be the same for all SafeDisc 3.15.XXX

Attached 2 exe. But I don't have a SafeDisc 3.15.XXX. So I don't know whether it works as expected.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,199 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jackal wrote:
sarami wrote:

I found this.
ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/document.95/95-104r0.pdf
http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pio/p … ManV31.pdf
So, I coded a new option to test.

Option Info
        /d8     Use 0xd8 as ReadCD command forcibly (for data disc)

What's different about this?

for these drives
http://forum.redump.org/post/49337/#p49337
e.g.
I bought the SONY CDU948S and I found this drive supporting 0xd8.
BTW, in case of PLEXTOR, /d8 option don't need. (Because it is by default on)

iR0b0t wrote:

one of my SafeDisc 1.35.000 games crashes on DIC if used /rc parameter.

Attached exe. But I don't test it.

Go to forum: General discussion

1,200 Reply by sarami

(3,536 replies, posted in General discussion)

I found this.
ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/document.95/95-104r0.pdf
http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pio/p … ManV31.pdf
So, I coded a new option to test.

Option Info
        /d8     Use 0xd8 as ReadCD command forcibly (for data disc)
iR0b0t wrote:

CodeLock   http://redump.org/discs/quicksearch/cod … ction/only

and other discs which use intentional c2 errors in combination with any other protections.

You could set this custom command in priority to EccEdc, which is "/rc" i think.

I don't have these protect disc. plz wait.

Jackal wrote:

is SafeDisc dumped with '55' pattern finally? using /rc parameter?

I think so.

Go to forum: General discussion