You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics
Search options (Page 48 of 57)
Topics by sarami User defined search
Posts found: 1,176 to 1,200 of 1,413
=================== Path Table Record, LBA[000020, 0x00014] ===================
:
:
Length of Directory Identifier: 1
Length of Extended Attribute Record: 0
Position of Extent: 51227
Number of Upper Directory: 1
Directory Identifier: C
Length of Directory Identifier: 8
Length of Extended Attribute Record: 0
Position of Extent: 51651
Number of Upper Directory: 1
Directory Identifier: CATALOGS
:
:
==================== Directory Record, LBA[000022, 0x00016] ===================
:
:
Length of Directory Record: 34
Extended Attribute Record Length: 0
Location of Extent: 51227
Data Length: 2048
Recording Date and Time: 1994-04-14 11:12:17 +00
File Flags: 2 (Visible, Directory, Disassociated, File has't record format, Owner/Group ID has't, Final Directory Record)
File Unit Size: 0
Interleave Gap Size: 0
Volume Sequence Number: 0
Length of File Identifier: 1
File Identifier: c
:
:
Length of Directory Record: 42
Extended Attribute Record Length: 0
Location of Extent: 51651
Data Length: 2048
Recording Date and Time: 1994-03-22 17:23:46 +00
File Flags: 2 (Visible, Directory, Disassociated, File has't record format, Owner/Group ID has't, Final Directory Record)
File Unit Size: 0
Interleave Gap Size: 0
Volume Sequence Number: 0
Length of File Identifier: 8
File Identifier: Catalogs
:
:
I found it to be a different Character code.
- fixed: compare string of directory (strncmp -> _strnicmp)
added log. please retest.
EDIT:
- fixed: DirectoryRecord
- added: old scsi drive
- fixed: check arg
- fixed: some bug
- added: coded about codelock (but don't test it enough)
- fixed: audio command (because couldn't get at LBA -75)
- fixed: Output volume descriptor for CDI (caesar's boxing)
iR0b0t wrote:Could you also maybe add an additional cuesheet file with the real track type for database purposes only if disc is a CDI title?
sorry, I can't understand the need a little.
iR0b0t wrote:sarami, could you check this up please > https://www.mediafire.com/?4cdtbp41ec1xp6g
The logs' contents differ in there.
EdcEcc reports last sector as:
LBA[026938, 0x0693a], mode 1 Reserved byte doesn't zero.
- added: message for audio or scrambled or corrupt sector
iR0b0t wrote:mainError log says:
LBA[026939, 0x0693b], Track[01]: This sector is data, but a header doesn't exist
LBA[026940, 0x0693c], Track[01]: This sector is data, but a header doesn't exist
LBA[026941, 0x0693d], Track[01]: This sector is data, but a header doesn't exist
coded but don't test.
MrX_Cuci wrote:Sometimes I get this error with certain disc:
Not everytime?
I uploaded 0820ver. for error log. plz retest.
and this
If you report a bug. Could you test the latest test version and tell me the following. (I don't support a old ver.)
- all created file except bin, img, scm
- disc title and region
It seems that the error sector of clonecd sub isn't update. So I think subdump and dic sub is correct.
MrX_Cuci wrote:Should the DIC sub match CloneCD sub for a protected disc? (SafeDisc 2.40.010 in this case) CCD and IMG files match, but SUB does not.
plz upload dic, clonecd, and subdump sub.
Warrior wrote:sarami is it possible to open the source to DIC so others can port it to other OS's?
I have a few acquaintances who wish to dump and only use Linux.
No problem as far as obey the license.
Thank's but I don't have this protect disc yet. plz wait..
axisleon wrote:Report 2015.08.03
FXNHE618 and FXHUD401 are ok.
When dump FXNHE401 -- 卒業ＩＩＦＸ, application crash. (before .ccd file made)
There are some log below, others all 0 bytes.
AppVersion
x86, AnsiBuild, Aug 4 2014 03:55:11
Thank's but could you test these in latest test version.
MigaMan wrote:So what is the current procedure for dumping/verifying the older systems such as Turbo Duo, Sega CD, etc.?
If you can read and edit a batch file, This may be useful...
http://www.mediafire.com/download/4lfcg … teImage.7z
uploaded 20150812 test ver.
MrX_Cuci wrote:do you know which drives works best with newer protections?
I don't know because I don't have enough protect disc to test and I recommend a drive only plextor made in Shinano Kenshi.
sarami wrote:I don't have these protect disc. plz wait.
I bought this. http://redump.org/disc/31708/
and I found it this protect has "icd*" text in IMAGE_SECTION_HEADER of the EXE file. (by PoxyLok http://gf.wiretarget.com/copylok.htm
iR0b0t, what kind of USB do you connect your 760a using?
Beginning from LBA 2120 it does not show any reading status messages and is only updating LBA numbers++
I don't yet understand why the data which I expected can't acquire even though a reading error doesn't happen...
I need more time to investigate the cause.
Besides of this, what can cause LBA number being shifted by 2 ?
Creating img (LBA) 2119/327442[F:ProcessReadCD][L:192] OperationCode: 0xd8
LBA[002121, 0x00849] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]
I confirmed it, I'll fix it by next update.
Thanks.
dic_PX-760A_mainError.txt of rc 30.rar wrote:===================== Main Channel, LBA[002121, 0x00849] ======================
+0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0( 0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b0 20 61
LBA[002121, 0x00849] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002121, 0x00849] ======================
+0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0( 0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b0 21 61
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002406, 0x00966] ======================
+0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0( 0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b4 05 61
LBA[002406, 0x00966] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002406, 0x00966] ======================
+0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0( 0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b4 06 61
dic_PX-760A_EdcEcc.txt of rc 30.rar wrote:LBA[002120, 0x00848], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002121, 0x00849], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002122, 0x0084a], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002123, 0x0084b], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002124, 0x0084c], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002125, 0x0084d], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
:
:
LBA[002193, 0x00891], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002194, 0x00892], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
A reading error doesn't seem to happen from 2122 to 2194 but replaced 0x55.
How does the error or message show from 2122 to 2194 on the console?
Don't know the cause...
- added: mainlog
- changed: log file name
If you have time, could you test by /rc 20, 30, 60
iR0b0t wrote:2105-2196
2405-2496
...
have the same pattern.
They begin with an incomplete sector (due to combined offset of +18 in this case),
the next sector has a repeated sector ID, i will make an example of the first group:
2105-2196
Sector 2105 has a correct header ID.
Sector 2106 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2105.
Sector 2107 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2106.
...
Sector 2121 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2120.
Beginning by sector 2121 and ending at sector 2196 all sectors have a repeated sector ID from sector 2120.
The last sector of this group = 2196 is not completelly replaced by 0x55.
Probably this problem is fixed. (But 2105, 2405, 2778... is replaced yet)
iR0b0t wrote:I don't want to dump it again just yet, because this disc took me 11 hours to dump.
/rc If read error, continue reading and ignore c2 error on specific
sector (Only CD)
For LaserLock, RingPROTECH, safedisc, smartE
val timeout value (default: 60)
If you reduce a ripping time, you should set "timeout value" (60 is 60sec=1min) If you set 30, ripping time will be reduced about 1/2, if you set 15, about 1/4.
axisleon wrote:Source: NEC PCFX Der Langrisser FXNHE618
Thank you.
- added: check PCFX sector
iR0b0t wrote:Those sectors should not have been replaced i think.
iR0b0t wrote:You can identify laserlock discs by a file called "LASERLOK.IN", but i think you already have it set.
Your log
Detected [LASERLOK.IN], Skip error from 337 to 10336
I have thought that those error sector should be replaced at 0x55.
If you right, it's difficult for me to recognize whether it is an error sector...
iR0b0t wrote:sarami, it should be okay now for SafeDisc 3.15.XXX
My disc does return 1 error more, but its due to a scratch.
I do believe this issue is fixed now, thanks for that.
Thanks test. Uploaded test version.
tossEAC wrote:QQ: is the SH-D162C supported for GDRom dumping?
I don't know because I don't have this drive...
MrX_Cuci wrote:When ripping a data DVD I get this in the command line windows: (PX-708A)
http://www.13thmonkey.org/documentation … c3r10g.pdf
According to this pdf, format 02 means the thing that returns the Disc Key obfuscated by using a Bus Key.
SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-6f-02, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - COPY PROTECTION KEY EXCHANGE
FAILURE - KEY NOT ESTABLISHED
Failure - Format 02
This error means the thing that can't get disc key because KEY NOT ESTABLISHED.
format 03 means the thing that returns the BCA(Burst Cutting Area) information on DVD media.
[F:ReadDVDStructure][L:360] OperationCode: 0xad
ScsiStatus: 02, CHECK_CONDITION
SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-24-00, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - INVALID FIELD IN CDB
Failure - Format 03
This error means the thing that your drive doesn't support getting BCA.
[F:ReadDVD][L:53] OperationCode: 0xa8
ScsiStatus: 02, CHECK_CONDITION
SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-24-00, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - INVALID FIELD IN CDB
This drive doesn't support streaming
I'll omit this streaming bit in the future because it isn't necessary.
iR0b0t wrote:There is another SafeDisc game which doesn't work as expected, i guess it will be the same for all SafeDisc 3.15.XXX
Attached 2 exe. But I don't have a SafeDisc 3.15.XXX. So I don't know whether it works as expected.
Jackal wrote:What's different about this?
for these drives
http://forum.redump.org/post/49337/#p49337
e.g.
I bought the SONY CDU948S and I found this drive supporting 0xd8.
BTW, in case of PLEXTOR, /d8 option don't need. (Because it is by default on)
iR0b0t wrote:one of my SafeDisc 1.35.000 games crashes on DIC if used /rc parameter.
Attached exe. But I don't test it.
Posts found: 1,176 to 1,200 of 1,413