1,151

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

uploaded 20150812 test ver.

MrX_Cuci wrote:

do you know which drives works best with newer protections?

I don't know because I don't have enough protect disc to test and I recommend a drive only plextor made in Shinano Kenshi.

1,152

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

sarami wrote:
iR0b0t wrote:

CodeLock   http://redump.org/discs/quicksearch/cod … ction/only

and other discs which use intentional c2 errors in combination with any other protections.

You could set this custom command in priority to EccEdc, which is "/rc" i think.

I don't have these protect disc. plz wait.

I bought this. http://redump.org/disc/31708/
and I found it this protect has "icd*" text in IMAGE_SECTION_HEADER of the EXE file. (by PoxyLok http://gf.wiretarget.com/copylok.htm

1,153

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t, what kind of USB do you connect your 760a using?

1,154

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

Beginning from LBA 2120 it does not show any reading status messages and is only updating LBA numbers++

I don't yet understand why the data which I expected can't acquire even though a reading error doesn't happen...
I need more time to investigate the cause.

Besides of this, what can cause LBA number being shifted by 2 ?
Creating img (LBA)   2119/327442[F:ProcessReadCD][L:192] OperationCode: 0xd8
LBA[002121, 0x00849] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]

I confirmed it, I'll fix it by next update.

1,155

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

Thanks.

dic_PX-760A_mainError.txt of rc 30.rar wrote:

===================== Main Channel, LBA[002121, 0x00849] ======================
              +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
      0(   0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b0 20 61
LBA[002121, 0x00849] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002121, 0x00849] ======================
              +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
      0(   0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b0 21 61
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002406, 0x00966] ======================
              +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
      0(   0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b4 05 61
LBA[002406, 0x00966] Read error. padding 0x55 [2336byte]
===================== Main Channel, LBA[002406, 0x00966] ======================
              +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
      0(   0) 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 01 b4 06 61

dic_PX-760A_EdcEcc.txt of rc 30.rar wrote:

LBA[002120, 0x00848], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002121, 0x00849], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002122, 0x0084a], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002123, 0x0084b], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002124, 0x0084c], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002125, 0x0084d], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
:
:
LBA[002193, 0x00891], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55
LBA[002194, 0x00892], 2336 bytes have been already replaced at 0x55

A reading error doesn't seem to happen from 2122 to 2194 but replaced 0x55.
How does the error or message show from 2122 to 2194 on the console?

1,156

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

Don't know the cause...
- added: mainlog
- changed: log file name
If you have time, could you test by /rc 20, 30, 60

1,157

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t wrote:

2105-2196
2405-2496
...
have the same pattern.
They begin with an incomplete sector (due to combined offset of +18 in this case),
the next sector has a repeated sector ID, i will make an example of the first group:
2105-2196
Sector 2105 has a correct header ID.
Sector 2106 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2105.
Sector 2107 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2106.
...
Sector 2121 has a repeated sector ID from sector 2120.
Beginning by sector 2121 and ending at sector 2196 all sectors have a repeated sector ID from sector 2120.
The last sector of this group = 2196 is not completelly replaced by 0x55.

Probably this problem is fixed. (But 2105, 2405, 2778... is replaced yet)

iR0b0t wrote:

I don't want to dump it again just yet, because this disc took me 11 hours to dump.

        /rc     If read error, continue reading and ignore c2 error on specific
                sector (Only CD)
                        For LaserLock, RingPROTECH, safedisc, smartE
                        val     timeout value (default: 60)

If you reduce a ripping time, you should set "timeout value" (60 is 60sec=1min) If you set 30, ripping time will be reduced about 1/2, if you set 15, about 1/4.

1,158

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

axisleon wrote:

Source: NEC PCFX Der Langrisser FXNHE618

Thank you.
- added: check PCFX sector

iR0b0t wrote:

Those sectors should not have been replaced i think.

iR0b0t wrote:

You can identify laserlock discs by a file called "LASERLOK.IN", but i think you already have it set.

Your log

Detected [LASERLOK.IN], Skip error from 337 to 10336

I have thought that those error sector should be replaced at 0x55.
If you right, it's difficult for me to recognize whether it is an error sector...

1,159

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t wrote:

sarami, it should be okay now for SafeDisc 3.15.XXX

My disc does return 1 error more, but its due to a scratch.

I do believe this issue is fixed now, thanks for that.

Thanks test. Uploaded test version.

1,160

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

tossEAC wrote:

QQ: is the SH-D162C supported for GDRom dumping?

I don't know because I don't have this drive...

MrX_Cuci wrote:

When ripping a data DVD I get this in the command line windows: (PX-708A)

http://www.13thmonkey.org/documentation … c3r10g.pdf
According to this pdf, format 02 means the thing that returns the Disc Key obfuscated by using a Bus Key.

SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-6f-02, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - COPY PROTECTION KEY EXCHANGE
 FAILURE - KEY NOT ESTABLISHED
Failure - Format 02

This error means the thing that can't get disc key because KEY NOT ESTABLISHED.

format 03 means the thing that returns the BCA(Burst Cutting Area) information on DVD media.

[F:ReadDVDStructure][L:360] OperationCode: 0xad
ScsiStatus: 02, CHECK_CONDITION
SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-24-00, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - INVALID FIELD IN CDB
Failure - Format 03

This error means the thing that your drive doesn't support getting BCA.

[F:ReadDVD][L:53] OperationCode: 0xa8
ScsiStatus: 02, CHECK_CONDITION
SenseData Key-Asc-Ascq: 05-24-00, ILLEGAL_REQUEST - INVALID FIELD IN CDB
This drive doesn't support streaming

I'll omit this streaming bit in the future because it isn't necessary.

1,161

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t wrote:

There is another SafeDisc game which doesn't work as expected, i guess it will be the same for all SafeDisc 3.15.XXX

Attached 2 exe. But I don't have a SafeDisc 3.15.XXX. So I don't know whether it works as expected.

1,162

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jackal wrote:
sarami wrote:

I found this.
ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/document.95/95-104r0.pdf
http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pio/p … ManV31.pdf
So, I coded a new option to test.

Option Info
        /d8     Use 0xd8 as ReadCD command forcibly (for data disc)

What's different about this?

for these drives
http://forum.redump.org/post/49337/#p49337
e.g.
I bought the SONY CDU948S and I found this drive supporting 0xd8.
BTW, in case of PLEXTOR, /d8 option don't need. (Because it is by default on)

iR0b0t wrote:

one of my SafeDisc 1.35.000 games crashes on DIC if used /rc parameter.

Attached exe. But I don't test it.

1,163

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

I found this.
ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/document.95/95-104r0.pdf
http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pio/p … ManV31.pdf
So, I coded a new option to test.

Option Info
        /d8     Use 0xd8 as ReadCD command forcibly (for data disc)
iR0b0t wrote:

CodeLock   http://redump.org/discs/quicksearch/cod … ction/only

and other discs which use intentional c2 errors in combination with any other protections.

You could set this custom command in priority to EccEdc, which is "/rc" i think.

I don't have these protect disc. plz wait.

Jackal wrote:

is SafeDisc dumped with '55' pattern finally? using /rc parameter?

I think so.

1,164

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

iR0b0t wrote:

sarami, any chance you can add command line support for replacing ALL sectors with C2 errors by '55' pattern?

What kind of disc needs it? If you can, could you tell me the disc titile and other info.

1,165

(5 replies, posted in General discussion)

I am using "audio" command to dump lead-in, lead-out.
If you dump an audio CD from lba 0 to end, you should use "cd" command.

1,166

(4 replies, posted in General discussion)

This disc is ring and sector error protect.
The problems of the ring protect are the same as this -> http://forum.redump.org/post/30465/#p30465

1,167

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

- improved: c2 error fixing (& omitted /c2 val 4)

1,168

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

sarami wrote:

possibly the difference of read cd command might affect the result... (possibly clonecd, isobuster, cd manipulator use 0xbe. DIC uses 0xd8)

- added: /be option for cd

        /be     Use 0xbe as ReadCD command

1,169

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

MrX_Cuci wrote:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/355 … adowMan.7z (should be up in a few minutes) Used latest test version

The reason of the huge sub & c2 error is unknown at this time, but possibly the difference of read cd command might affect the result... (possibly clonecd, isobuster, cd manipulator use 0xbe. DIC uses 0xd8)

1,170

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

Uploaded test ver.
- fixed: detect adr sector
- fixed: Label Gate CD, XCP disc

1,171

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

Uploaded test ver.

MrX_Cuci wrote:

About Securom, I can upload clonecd, isobuster, cd mainpulator dump and the one from DIC if that helps?

All DIC log plz.

1,172

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

But I want to know why the hash is different.

1,173

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

MrX_Cuci wrote:

Securom v3 or less doesn't seem to work correctly. I get different hashes then ISObuster, CloneCD and CD Manipulator dump

This dump matches my ISOBuster, CloneCD and CD Manipulator dump: http://redump.org/disc/18323/

Securom v3 or less is subchannel protection (like libcrypt). So the cause that the hash varies is different.

1,174

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

MrX_Cuci wrote:

Found another:
CATALOG 0000000000000
FILE "TerraOEM.bin" BINARY
  TRACK 01 MODE43/2352
    INDEX 01 00:00:00

Uploaded 20150522

1,175

(3,493 replies, posted in General discussion)

MrX_Cuci wrote:

I have a disc here that is error free with other tools. DIC detects errors. I tried a different drive, same hashes and error free.

Could you tell me the all your ripping drive? (vendor, model, firmware version)