Jackal wrote:But is there an easy way (without redumping) to check similar dumps for any descrambled sectors that should have remained scrambled?
Scrambled sector of mode 1
---
0x814: 0x48, 0x815: 0x64, 0x816: 0x36, 0x817: 0xab, 0x818: 0x56, 0x819: 0xff, 0x81a: 0x7e, 0x81b: 0xc0
descrambled sector of mode 1
---
0x814: 0x00, 0x815: 0x00, 0x816: 0x00, 0x817: 0x00, 0x818: 0x00, 0x819: 0x00, 0x81a: 0x00, 0x81b: 0x00
Jackal wrote:but can we be sure that the offset of this dump is correct? ... but there were some cases where different reading modes would give different offsets (588 samples difference with some SecuROM discs)
According the disc.txt, SubCode[0], [2] and [8] show 285 samples. Perhaps px_d8 also outputs same result. But there isn't sync in LBA:14098.
This sync of LBA:14098 is LBA:14099.
04B0 : 1C 43 49 F1 F6 C4 1A 43 1F 41 38 2B 00 FF FF FF .CI....C.A8+....
04C0 : FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 00 02 89 74 61 00 28 00 1E ..........ta.(..
I don't know why there isn't sync in LBA:014098. Gulf War Soukouden of FMT has similar problem. http://forum.redump.org/topic/16418/add … new-dumps/