<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Redump Forum — Too many scratches on disc?]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.redump.org/topic/9650/too-many-scratches-on-disc/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/rss/topic/9650/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Too many scratches on disc?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.4</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Too many scratches on disc?]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/35468/#p35468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Agreed about the LiteOn, mine can read damaged discs that my Plextors cannot and the hashes match db.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Nexy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/35468/#p35468</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Too many scratches on disc?]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/35464/#p35464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why not polish the surface using a car polishment or alike? I managed to repair a lot of damaged CDs with this method.</p><p>You can repair the scratches in the bottom side using a polishment (Rub from the centre to the edge of disc, never radially), except if reflective layer is damaged (Label side). Remove polishment´s leftovers using alcohol and dry the CD.</p><p>Moreover, you can try a Lite-On or TSST drive (With Mediatek chipset, +6 in AccurateRip´s list). In my experience, they can read flawlessly damaged discs that other drives cannot read.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pablogm123)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/35464/#p35464</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Too many scratches on disc?]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/35463/#p35463</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have already tried 2 different drives, I am going to try it with another drive when I find it.<br />Someone gave me these games and all of them are badly scratched, but some are not yet in the DB so I hope I can find a way to dump them correctly.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TPSNT)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/35463/#p35463</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Too many scratches on disc?]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/35462/#p35462</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yea, if you keep getting different hashes, then that means either the disc is scratched, the drive has a weak laser, or a mix of both.&nbsp; That&#039;s why it&#039;s so important to dump more than once to make sure you get a consistent set of hashes, and it&#039;s preferred if you could dump in more than 1 drive as well.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (DJoneK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/35462/#p35462</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Too many scratches on disc?]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/35461/#p35461</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have some PSX games which I am trying to dump, but I can&#039;t get them to match the DB. I have dumped them with different drives and I am getting different results each time. The size always matches, but the checksum is different each time.<br />IsoBuster never reported any read errors, but all the discs have lots and lots of small scratches. I have never dumped PSX games before, so is it possible I am doing something wrong? Do I have bad drives? Or are the discs just too scratched?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TPSNT)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/35461/#p35461</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
