<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Redump Forum — px_d8 Reporting Different Combined Offsets]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.redump.org/topic/5700/pxd8-reporting-different-combined-offsets/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/rss/topic/5700/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in px_d8 Reporting Different Combined Offsets.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.4</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: px_d8 Reporting Different Combined Offsets]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/23174/#p23174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>yes, CD = factory offset</p><p>it doesn&#039;t have to be @0, mostly it won&#039;t be<br />there is this freedom left in definition of CD medium<br />i wouldn&#039;t reallly know why<br />i guess maybe data synchronization, when mastering, the way they did it<br />was rather complicated process back then<br />so this would allow to overcome certain technological difficultties</p><p>generally CDs for older systems, like SCD, will have those offsets more random at wider range<br />most extreme values currently in DB must be around several thousands</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (themabus)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/23174/#p23174</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: px_d8 Reporting Different Combined Offsets]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/23172/#p23172</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thx.</p><p>So, I assume, the additional offset would be a factory offset or mastering error?</p><p>That puts Mad Dog McCree at -298. Which seems WAY off.</p><p>That game has to be the worst mastering job ever. The exe date in the header and the exe date reported by the actual file are a year apart. Same date, different year. Which I can only attribute to human error.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (trmchenry)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/23172/#p23172</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: px_d8 Reporting Different Combined Offsets]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/23171/#p23171</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hi trmchenry</p><p>those listed @AccurateRip are drive offsets<br />they are indeed constant</p><p>value px_d8 returns is combined offset (drive+CD)<br />you&#039;d use this value for EAC offset correction<br />knowing drive offset, you can derive CD offset<br />CD offsets are required for DB</p><p>so you must run px_d8 with each CD</p><p>from your example, assuming drive offset is +30<br />you&#039;d rip Ground Zero Texas with offset correction +30 and submit 0 to DB;<br />Mickey Mania with +32 and submit +2</p><p>it would be better at first to compare some CDs to already existing DB entries<br />if there are none, maybe audio tracks of Mickey Mania are comparable to <a href="http://redump.org/disc/7689/">European release</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (themabus)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/23171/#p23171</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[px_d8 Reporting Different Combined Offsets]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/23169/#p23169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not sure if this is accurate behavior or not.</p><p>I am preparing to archive my collection of every USA Sega CD release and obviously am looking to do it in the most accurate way possible. I even purchased a new Plextor Plexwriter Premium for this purpose.</p><p>After going through Rocknroms stickied MegaCD/Saturn guide I&#039;m left with an issue...</p><p>Ground Zero Texas: I run the px_d8 tool and come back with a combined offset of +30. A number that matches the AccurateRip offset DB.</p><p>Mickey Mania: I run the px_d8 tool and it reports a combined offset of +32.</p><p>What&#039;s the issue here? Should I be running the px_d8 tool with each new disc I rip? Seems to me that the offset should be something that&#039;s constant.</p><p>I really don&#039;t want to continue without really nailing down a process for what I&#039;m doing.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (trmchenry)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/23169/#p23169</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
