<![CDATA[Redump Forum — Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/topic/5656/problem-with-audio-cd-dump/ Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:09:31 +0000 PunBB 1.4.4 <![CDATA[Re: Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22995/#p22995 No, lol, I have never dumped any audio disc, don't worry. I wouldn't do anything I'm not sure about, or better said, I would have known how to do it if I ever did it.

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:09:31 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22995/#p22995 <![CDATA[Re: Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22994/#p22994 RiMMER wrote:

He's not drunk, he's ripping a disc which contains only audio tracks, no data track (soundtrack ?).
In that case, I believe too, that gaps should be appended to previous tracks.

Because it's not written anywhere on this site and your thoughts is a horrible mistake (I don't understand the reason you've decided this way can be correct). Pregaps are always belong to the "next" track, there are no exclusions. If any of you have dumped any CDDA disc this way for the db, better tell it right now smile

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:05:48 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22994/#p22994 <![CDATA[Re: Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22993/#p22993 ok i got it

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:50:24 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22993/#p22993 <![CDATA[Re: Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22990/#p22990 He's not drunk, he's ripping a disc which contains only audio tracks, no data track (soundtrack ?).
In that case, I believe too, that gaps should be appended to previous tracks.

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:05:44 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22990/#p22990 <![CDATA[Re: Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22988/#p22988 Are you drunk or what? Gaps should never be appended to the previous track, only to the next one. Stop imagining things.

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:03:43 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22988/#p22988 <![CDATA[Re: Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22985/#p22985 Yes the gaps are previous, EAC 0.99 prebeta 5.

I dumped with next for testing and it worked, it was mountable. but not with previous.

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:58:25 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22985/#p22985 <![CDATA[Re: Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22982/#p22982 Ripping pure audio is different, you append to PREVIOUS track.

I dunno how that cue sheet got so screwed up though... a complete mess. There should be just INDEX 01's, no INDEX 00's.

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:49:59 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22982/#p22982 <![CDATA[Re: Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22978/#p22978 Wow, that CUE is seriously screwed up, no wonder Alcohol rejects it. Do you have the "append to next track" option enabled in EAC?

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:10:53 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22978/#p22978 <![CDATA[Problem with audio cd dump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22975/#p22975 when I try to mount it gives me the following error message "Alcohol Emulation Core : No starting index was defined for the previous track"

Here is the EAC cue

FILE "Track01.bin" BINARY
  TRACK 01 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 02 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 00:50:27
FILE "Track02.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 03 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 02:34:48
FILE "Track03.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 04 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 02:29:73
FILE "Track04.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 05 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 03:57:14
FILE "Track05.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 06 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 04:05:41
FILE "Track06.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 07 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 04:12:17
FILE "Track07.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 08 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 03:09:18
FILE "Track08.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 09 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 02:00:10
FILE "Track09.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 10 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 04:11:43
FILE "Track10.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 11 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 02:57:58
FILE "Track11.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 12 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 04:30:20
FILE "Track12.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 13 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 06:12:06
FILE "Track13.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 14 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 04:56:38
FILE "Track14.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 15 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 04:42:71
FILE "Track15.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 16 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 04:28:54
FILE "Track16.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 17 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 04:14:29
FILE "Track17.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 18 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 02:02:00
FILE "Track18.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 19 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 02:00:00
FILE "Track19.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 20 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 02:00:00
FILE "Track20.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 21 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 00:53:29
FILE "Track21.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 22 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 01:59:08
FILE "Track22.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00
  TRACK 23 AUDIO
    FLAGS DCP
    INDEX 00 02:00:66
FILE "Track23.bin" BINARY
    INDEX 01 00:00:00

I need an index 00 for track 1 ? If I understood correctly, but what?

]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:27:01 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22975/#p22975