<![CDATA[Redump Forum — [FIXED] It is Agile Warrior F-111X, not F-IIIX]]> http://forum.redump.org/topic/5640/fixed-it-is-agile-warrior-f111x-not-fiiix/ Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:26:11 +0000 PunBB 1.4.4 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED] It is Agile Warrior F-111X, not F-IIIX]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22934/#p22934 hmm, think its best to switch to the old name and good is it  roll

]]> Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:26:11 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22934/#p22934 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED] It is Agile Warrior F-111X, not F-IIIX]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22932/#p22932 No space, like F-111X.

Actually, the manual and disc say Agile Warrior: F-111X.

Since I have the opportunity. In such cases of title confusion, which title takes precedence?

http://i50.tinypic.com/1zy7aqp.png

]]> Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:24:27 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22932/#p22932 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED] It is Agile Warrior F-111X, not F-IIIX]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22931/#p22931 is it actually F-111X or F-111 X ?

]]> Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:12:19 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22931/#p22931 <![CDATA[[FIXED] It is Agile Warrior F-111X, not F-IIIX]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/22930/#p22930 http://redump.org/disc/10703/

The game disc itself says F-111X. The manual says F-111X, and says the aircraft is based off of the F-111.

This new fighter would combine the YF-23's high performance airframe, the X-31's thrust-vectoring maneuverability, and the F-111's superior terrain and weapon-guidance systems.

The font that was used for the cover is just misleading.

If you must use F-IIIX, it should be an alternate title.

]]> Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:27:18 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/22930/#p22930