<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Redump Forum — Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors.]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.redump.org/topic/5628/audio-tracks-with-quality-100-but-no-read-errors/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/rss/topic/5628/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors..]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.4</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors.]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/22895/#p22895</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ah, okay then. It had me worried with Revolution X that the &quot;corrected sectors&quot; were null.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (velocity37)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/22895/#p22895</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors.]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/22894/#p22894</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Track quality &lt; 100% just means that EAC had to do some error correction on one or more sectors. As long as it doesn&#039;t report read errors it&#039;s fine, don&#039;t worry about it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (r09)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/22894/#p22894</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors.]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/22893/#p22893</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello all.</p><p>I&#039;ve ran into this on a couple of discs and I seek advice. At the end of the track&#039;s read, one of the rows of EAC&#039;s error correction will start to light up. The resulting track has a quality &gt;= 99.7%.</p><p>One disk I ran into this I know is a good dump, as the track matches one in the db (Battle Arena Toshinden Remix, Saturn, Track 10).</p><p>I have two Playstation games at the moment that do this as well. Agile Warrior F-IIIX and Revolution X. Agile Warrior does this on Track 9, and Revolution X does it on 5, 7, and 11. With these two discs, I have no db entries to compare my dump to.</p><p>How should I proceed? I have a PX-760A coming in the mail, so I can try some plextor-specific tools. (Need it to dump the last track on that pesky +588 saturn game <img src="http://forum.redump.org/img/smilies/cool.png" width="15" height="15" alt="cool" /> )</p><p>Verified Revolution X<br />-----------------------------------<br />Edit: Matched a web dump to my Revolution X Track 5 with some sample shifting, so this is truly the way the disc is. I did not expect this at all. When originally checking my dumps, since the tracks were signed RIFF WAVE, I determined the file length based on the header and extracted a proper WAV. The result was a file that had blank samples at the end, which didn&#039;t happen with the 100% tracks. The disc must have just been made badly :S</p><p>I expect I&#039;ll find the same with tracks 7 and 11, but I&#039;ll check.</p><p>Yep, all three tracks match after sample shifting.<br />-----------------------------------</p><p>I&#039;ll have to see if I can find something to match up to Agile Warrior. What are some general rules of thumb on this though?</p><p>Verified Agile Warrior<br />-----------------------------------<br />Web version only had one data track, but I was able to match the start and end of the track. The file didn&#039;t match exactly, as the web version had its data stored in a data track vs an audio track, but I was able to align the ends of each, verifying that my end sectors are good.<br />-----------------------------------</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (velocity37)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 10:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/22893/#p22893</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
