<![CDATA[Redump Forum — Preferred CUE Gap Markup]]> http://forum.redump.org/topic/4929/preferred-cue-gap-markup/ Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:41:39 +0000 PunBB 1.4.4 <![CDATA[Re: Preferred CUE Gap Markup]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/19877/#p19877 PREGAP and POSTGAP aren't alternatives to each other, 00 index (before the track) is pregap, 02 to 99 (after the track itself) - postgap. Full dump -- cue with indexes, stripped dump (gaps were cut out) -- cue with PREGAP/POSTGAP commands (they tell the burning tool or emulator to insert some null samples there). This "vote" is pointless, hence closed.

]]> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:41:39 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/19877/#p19877 <![CDATA[Re: Preferred CUE Gap Markup]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/19864/#p19864 Thanks for the reply Rocknroms.

Hehe I'm curious as to what the "Other?" method is that someone voted for...hehe guess I'm going to learn something new. smile

]]> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:41:06 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/19864/#p19864 <![CDATA[Re: Preferred CUE Gap Markup]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/19862/#p19862 Real cues normally have only INDEX (00 & 01 to store gaps)

]]> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:40:59 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/19862/#p19862 <![CDATA[Preferred CUE Gap Markup]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/19853/#p19853 I was just wondering whats the preferred method of markup for gaps in single or multi asset CUE files?

I'm toying around with scripts to create CUE's, Join files based on CUE's, Split files based on CUE's,...silly stuff anyways.

]]> Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:43:57 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/19853/#p19853