<![CDATA[Redump Forum — [Solved] Question about 'Ripping the audio tracks' in guide]]> http://forum.redump.org/topic/2520/solved-question-about-ripping-the-audio-tracks-in-guide/ Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:01:59 +0000 PunBB 1.4.4 <![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Question about 'Ripping the audio tracks' in guide]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/5752/#p5752 Vigi wrote:

What we meant is 'go back 149 sectors, then one more' (so 150 in total) because sometimes if you go back 150 at once it won't show any garbage.

Sorry, I overlooked the next line.
Thanks.

]]> Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:01:59 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/5752/#p5752 <![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Question about 'Ripping the audio tracks' in guide]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/5749/#p5749 fuzzball wrote:

Determining the (factory) write offset
If the Track02 pregap was 2 seconds, or 150 sectors, go back 149 sectors (substract 149 from from the number in the white box);

Is the part of an underline right? Or is 'go back 150 sectors'?

What we meant is 'go back 149 sectors, then one more' (so 150 in total) because sometimes if you go back 150 at once it won't show any garbage.

]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:24:22 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/5749/#p5749 <![CDATA[[Solved] Question about 'Ripping the audio tracks' in guide]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/5744/#p5744

Determining the (factory) write offset
If the Track02 pregap was 2 seconds, or 150 sectors, go back 149 sectors (substract 149 from from the number in the white box);

Is the part of an underline right? Or is 'go back 150 sectors'?

]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:36:16 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/5744/#p5744