<![CDATA[Redump Forum — Why isn't my .sub listed in the DB?]]> http://forum.redump.org/topic/24285/why-isnt-my-sub-listed-in-the-db/ Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:46:00 +0000 PunBB 1.4.4 <![CDATA[Re: Why isn't my .sub listed in the DB?]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/74209/#p74209 F1ReB4LL wrote:

For the data-only CDs - nope.

Can I use contain data track, that is, MIXCD or multiCD?

F1ReB4LL wrote:

(except for the Audio CDs with no data tracks)

What about Audio CDs?

Is Option (for CD SubChannel) OK with just / s 2 except for PSX and SecuROM?(Is there a disk that needs to use / np, / nq, / nr, etc?)

Does the .bin contain subchannel data?

]]> Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:46:00 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/74209/#p74209 <![CDATA[Re: Why isn't my .sub listed in the DB?]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/74014/#p74014 mRNA wrote:

Why isn't my .sub listed in the DB?

What .sub? What do you mean?

mRNA wrote:

Is /a valid for CDs that contain data tracks?

For the data-only CDs - nope.

mRNA wrote:

There is a theory that the exact offset may be minus 30 from AccurateRip, but is the log submitted with minus 30 valid?

We're fixing the combined offset (CD write offset + drive read offset), so it doesn't matter, the tracks are the same regardless of EAC/PR-style offset (except for the Audio CDs with no data tracks). We've even used to store both EAC and PerfectRip offset values before.

]]> Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:24:35 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/74014/#p74014 <![CDATA[Why isn't my .sub listed in the DB?]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/73688/#p73688 In README.md,
=> It can read in reverse, but specifications are not decided in redump.org
Is written,Is the specification under development?
Is /a valid for CDs that contain data tracks?
There is a theory that the exact offset may be minus 30 from AccurateRip, but is the log submitted with minus 30 valid?

]]> Fri, 04 Oct 2019 21:15:10 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/73688/#p73688