<![CDATA[Redump Forum — DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/topic/17889/dicui-a-simple-effective-dic-gui-is-now-available/ Sun, 22 Aug 2021 14:46:12 +0000 PunBB 1.4.4 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/94101/#p94101 Please unpin this is no longer news and part of the standard dumping guide.

]]> Sun, 22 Aug 2021 14:46:12 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/94101/#p94101 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/63871/#p63871 fuzzball wrote:

DICUI(1.10) extracts Sega Saturn's PVD from sector 0.

It has already been fixed.
https://github.com/reignstumble/DICUI/issues/118

]]> Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:48:34 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/63871/#p63871 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/63804/#p63804 DICUI(1.10) extracts Sega Saturn's PVD from sector 0.

!submissionInfo.txt

Primary Volume Descriptor (PVD):

0320 : 52 F1 72 02 1F 21 51 F2  71 FF 1F 12 21 18 8B F0   R.r..!Q.q...!...
0330 : 7F 14 00 0B 00 09 00 90  06 00 2D 80 06 00 2D 84   ..........-...-.
0340 : 06 00 2D 7C 25 F8 00 00  7F E0 D3 15 1F 37 E3 00   ..-|%........7..
0350 : 1F 33 E3 00 1F 32 D3 13  1F 31 E3 00 2F 32 A0 12   .3...2...1../2..
0360 : 00 09 52 F7 72 04 1F 27  72 FC 63 22 52 F3 32 3C   ..R.r..'r.c"R.2<
0370 : 1F 23 53 F2 23 2A 1F 32  53 F2 51 F1 31 38 1F 11   .#S.#*.2S.Q.18..

mainInfo.txt

========== LBA[000000, 0000000]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 53 45 47 41 20 53 45 47  41 53 41 54 55 52 4E 20   SEGA SEGASATURN 
0010 : 53 45 47 41 20 54 50 20  54 2D 31 32 20 20 20 20   SEGA TP T-12    
    :
0320 : 52 F1 72 02 1F 21 51 F2  71 FF 1F 12 21 18 8B F0   R.r..!Q.q...!...
0330 : 7F 14 00 0B 00 09 00 90  06 00 2D 80 06 00 2D 84   ..........-...-.
0340 : 06 00 2D 7C 25 F8 00 00  7F E0 D3 15 1F 37 E3 00   ..-|%........7..
0350 : 1F 33 E3 00 1F 32 D3 13  1F 31 E3 00 2F 32 A0 12   .3...2...1../2..
0360 : 00 09 52 F7 72 04 1F 27  72 FC 63 22 52 F3 32 3C   ..R.r..'r.c"R.2<
0370 : 1F 23 53 F2 23 2A 1F 32  53 F2 51 F1 31 38 1F 11   .#S.#*.2S.Q.18..
    :
07E0 : 3C 2B 45 7C 1B 47 98 E1  76 25 34 44 23 35 79 D0   <+E|.G..v%4D#5y.
07F0 : 57 9F 13 E1 64 44 44 44  4F 1E E1 64 44 44 44 4F   W...dDDDO..dDDDO
========== LBA[000016, 0x00010]: Main Channel ==========
       +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7  +8 +9 +A +B +C +D +E +F
0000 : 01 43 44 30 30 31 01 00  53 45 47 41 20 53 45 47   .CD001..SEGA SEG
0010 : 41 53 41 54 55 52 4E 20  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20   ASATURN         
    :
0320 : 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  20 20 20 20 20 31 39 39                199
0330 : 36 30 32 30 36 31 37 32  31 35 35 30 30 DC 31 39   6020617215500.19
0340 : 39 36 30 32 30 36 31 37  32 31 35 35 30 30 DC 30   96020617215500.0
0350 : 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30  30 30 30 30 30 30 30 00   000000000000000.
0360 : 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30  30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30   0000000000000000
0370 : 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................
    :

And a little, "Build date" format is YYYY-MM-DD.

]]> Sun, 23 Sep 2018 05:40:41 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/63804/#p63804 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/63228/#p63228 Okay, good work :thumbsup:

]]> Thu, 06 Sep 2018 23:14:59 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/63228/#p63228 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/63227/#p63227 iR0b0t wrote:

Did you guys fix layerbreak info output? Some people reported wrong layerbreaks, i wonder if they got it from DICUI output or DIC itself by manually copying from a wrong text line.

It should be fixed in the newest builds. That was an older issue.

iR0b0t wrote:

One more question, is the tool named DICUI or DICGUI ?
I see both names appear at some places smile

DICUI

]]> Thu, 06 Sep 2018 23:08:50 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/63227/#p63227 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/63225/#p63225 Did you guys fix layerbreak info output? Some people reported wrong layerbreaks, i wonder if they got it from DICUI output or DIC itself by manually copying from a wrong text line.

Edit: an example http://forum.redump.org/topic/18425/
It looks like DICUI was/is taking this information from a wrong text line. In this particular case the correct value is to be find in line 148

LayerZeroSector: 2032592 (0x1f03d0)

If you want to gather it from starting text lines you will have to calculate it:
line 15 - line 13 + 1 = layerbreak value

EndLayerZeroSector: 2229199 (0x2203cf)
-
StartingDataSector:  196608 (0x30000)
+
1
=
2032592

One more question, is the tool named DICUI or DICGUI ?
I see both names appear at some places smile

]]> Thu, 06 Sep 2018 22:18:44 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/63225/#p63225 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/62341/#p62341 A new stable build is out: https://github.com/reignstumble/DICUI/releases/tag/1.10

Added many new options for user customization
Added unit testing and an AppVeyor build
Many code refactorings
LOG WINDOW
Separated out protection scan and Unshield ports to new projects
Added "empty drive" support; should help with 3DO and HFS dumping
And much more! See the full Git commit list for more details

Wohoo!! Great work DICUI team smile

]]> Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:02:46 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/62341/#p62341 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/62231/#p62231 Yeah, that must be correct, i forgot about the EDC bytes in Form 2

]]> Sun, 22 Jul 2018 13:41:35 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/62231/#p62231 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/62230/#p62230 iR0b0t wrote:

because FORM2 sectors have no EDC & ECC.

http://www.multimediadirector.com/help/technology/images/gif/cdsectors.gif

]]> Sun, 22 Jul 2018 13:27:34 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/62230/#p62230 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/62221/#p62221 I have no idea. sad

All i know is that PoPoRoGue (Japan) (v1.0) (SCPS 10050) uses the Red hand version
https://bxk07344.c.blog.so-net.ne.jp/_images/blog/_c42/bxk07344/m_ePSXe-10-02b0f.png
While PoPoRoGue (Japan) (v1.1) (SCPS 91312 / PSone Books version) use the other one.
http://trynet.fc2web.com/image/keikoku.gif

I verified it on a 1002 equipped with a 1st gen modchip

Maybe someone with the required skills could check and compare both versions to see what has been changed ?

]]> Sun, 22 Jul 2018 02:35:55 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/62221/#p62221 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/62146/#p62146 @sarami or @Square: do either of you know how to detect that "red hand" antimod screen? I'd like to see if I can get that working in part of DICUI.

]]> Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:01:46 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/62146/#p62146 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/62134/#p62134 Due to *cough* programmer error, we now have an updated check for EDC in a Git branch.

]]> Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:02:43 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/62134/#p62134 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/62124/#p62124 You can basically check only a few sectors or scan the entire data track.
For the second one, if all sectors have EDC bytes set to '00' its a NO EDC.
You can subtract 150 postgap sectors, as they can have EDC bytes set no matter what.

Also, only check MODE2 FORM1 sectors, *corrected*

]]> Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:16:01 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/62124/#p62124 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/62123/#p62123 Bump on that EDC question, what's a good identifier from DIC outputs to see if there's EDC or not?

]]> Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:56:53 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/62123/#p62123 <![CDATA[Re: DICUI: A simple, effective DIC GUI is now available!]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/61964/#p61964 For the EDC check, the current code sees if there are any missing EDC instances as per the DIC output and then if there are, it says it doesn't have EDC. If this is inaccurate, how many missing instances are needed before saying a disc doesn't have EDC? Is it if the sector count matches the error count? Or is it lower, like 300?

]]> Thu, 05 Jul 2018 03:03:59 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/61964/#p61964