<![CDATA[Redump Forum — [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/topic/16655/ibm-pc-games-to-redump/ Sat, 07 Mar 2020 06:10:57 +0000 PunBB 1.4.4 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/78031/#p78031 I verified that VOB Protect CD has illegal MSF, so these all need to be redumped without /sf

]]> Sat, 07 Mar 2020 06:10:57 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/78031/#p78031 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/73061/#p73061 Sweet, now we just need the rest.

]]> Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:51:45 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/73061/#p73061 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/73058/#p73058 Nexy wrote:

It is, the first sector usually has something other than 00 in it.

Perfect. Both Hugo: Nell'Isola Selvaggia and WarChiefs are now fixed.

]]> Mon, 09 Sep 2019 09:09:33 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/73058/#p73058 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/73030/#p73030 It is, the first sector usually has something other than 00 in it.

]]> Sun, 08 Sep 2019 19:46:43 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/73030/#p73030 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/73019/#p73019 Just redumped http://redump.org/disc/63746/ without /sf, 10 bad MSF errors. Those sectors are entirely filled with 0x00 but the sync. I hope this is correct for SmartE.

]]> Sun, 08 Sep 2019 12:56:12 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/73019/#p73019 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72995/#p72995 There are also other discs like that, but yes.

]]> Sat, 07 Sep 2019 20:16:59 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72995/#p72995 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72994/#p72994 iR0b0t wrote:

There are as of now just 41 discs with yellow status, which clearly don't belong into a datfile because they are either overdumped, underdumped or pirate discs.

You do realize, of course, that all your other X360 German demo dumps were verified, yet the unverified ones are still yellow on that list?

Not so clear.

]]> Sat, 07 Sep 2019 20:11:34 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72994/#p72994 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72993/#p72993 Simple thing. Throw few k $$$ into these titles and turn them proper green. Any volunteers? wink

]]> Sat, 07 Sep 2019 20:02:54 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72993/#p72993 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72992/#p72992 http://redump.org/discs/status/3/

There are as of now just 41 discs with yellow status, which clearly don't belong into a datfile because they are either overdumped, underdumped or pirate discs.

You do have a full list of discs to be redumped listed above, no need to mark them yellow.

]]> Sat, 07 Sep 2019 20:01:00 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72992/#p72992 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72964/#p72964 Jackal wrote:

If you change them to yellow, people will discard the dumps and this will hurt preservation.

I agree completely, which is why we should have Yellow dumps in the datfile. iRobot... come around man.

]]> Thu, 05 Sep 2019 20:59:05 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72964/#p72964 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72963/#p72963 LoStraniero91 wrote:

http://redump.org/disc/63292/

The Lite-On SOHD-167T managed to read sector 4953, bringing the total error count to 960. I think that's the max it could do. I tried re-reading the sectors "before" the good ones 50 times and it failed.

960 is correct for that variation of LaserLock. Bare in mind that you'll have to reread the "lone" error sectors in scrambled mode as they are soft errors that are no longer being replaced with 0x55.

]]> Thu, 05 Sep 2019 20:54:27 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72963/#p72963 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72956/#p72956 http://redump.org/disc/63292/

The Lite-On SOHD-167T managed to read sector 4953, bringing the total error count to 960. I think that's the max it could do. I tried re-reading the sectors "before" the good ones 50 times and it failed.

]]> Thu, 05 Sep 2019 18:25:17 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72956/#p72956 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72915/#p72915 iR0b0t doesnt want yellow dumps in the datfile.

If you change them to yellow, people will discard the dumps and this will hurt preservation. It will not motivate people in any way to buy them and redump them. We're already doing the best we can.

]]> Tue, 03 Sep 2019 03:58:37 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72915/#p72915 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72911/#p72911 They should be yellow imo, they are bad dumps. I have redumped my SmartE discs and reminded others to do the same. If we need to re-collect some discs due to people selling them, then they should be added to whichever spreadsheet and marked high priority.

]]> Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:10:44 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72911/#p72911 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://forum.redump.org/post/72895/#p72895 Why not just include yellows in the dat? That would ensure redump remains accurate and kills two birds.

]]> Mon, 02 Sep 2019 18:00:59 +0000 http://forum.redump.org/post/72895/#p72895