<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Redump Forum — Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.redump.org/topic/16283/rise-from-your-grave-redump-pclone-dats/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/rss/topic/16283/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.4</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/55786/#p55786</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi iR0bot. Thanks for dropping in, and thank you for all the great work you&#039;ve done for Redump <img src="http://forum.redump.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>I think it may worth exploring &#039;why&#039; parent / clone DATs are desirable. Personally, I like the notion of &#039;game families&#039;. I like the separation of &#039;unique&#039; software for a platform - it makes exploring software libraries more manageable. I frequently ask myself the question: &#039;How many unique titles were released for system X&#039;?. Grouping a game&#039;s parts (discs, for example) is one element of that, as is the higher-level &#039;Family&#039; encapsulation.</p><p>I would love to know what others think of this. Why do they want p/clone DATs? Do they share my mindset that this kind of grouping is a good tool for helping with in the study of games?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (midget35)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/55786/#p55786</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/55781/#p55781</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There is no priority on that list, the comment on priority is only valid for the first list &quot;working on, priority order desc&quot;,which is empty just yet.</p><p>Right now i am working things down which i think are the fastest to be done with. But i can change it on request.</p><p>The p/clone dats is a difficult topic, before i can do anything on it i need to have a good plan on how to realize it. The discussion on that topic link was not resulting in a final plan.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (iR0b0t)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/55781/#p55781</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/55779/#p55779</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jackal. It&#039;s a shame to see p/clone far down the list of priorities, but the higher priority items are justified (sub-channel data, clrmame support, etc).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (midget35)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/55779/#p55779</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/55778/#p55778</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s still on the TODO list - <a href="http://forum.redump.org/topic/7446/database-todo-shedule/">http://forum.redump.org/topic/7446/data … o-shedule/</a><br />iR0b0t is the only site coder, so no idea if or when this will be implemented.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jackal)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/55778/#p55778</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.redump.org/post/55777/#p55777</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p><p>Half a decade ago (!) there were rumblings that Redump might support p/clone DATs. The post I found is here:<br /><a href="http://forum.redump.org/topic/12875/datfiles-and-parentclone-relationships/">http://forum.redump.org/topic/12875/dat … tionships/</a></p><p>I am wondering - is this something the community is interested in, and if so, what have the obstacles been in making these DATs a reality?</p><p>I ask because I have been working on a tool that helps automatically group games into their parent / clone relationships. If the sheer manual labour involved has been an obstacle in the past, my tools will surely help.</p><p>Appreciate your thoughts on this. Cheers.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (midget35)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.redump.org/post/55777/#p55777</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
