<![CDATA[Redump Forum — [FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> 2025-11-25T08:03:09Z PunBB http://forum.redump.org/topic/67302/fixedibm-pc-myst-die-trilogie/ <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> Put 18155 to red status, removed Rerelease from the other disc.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62557/ 2025-11-25T08:03:09Z http://forum.redump.org/post/133560/#p133560 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> Thanks for checking. irobot's dump can be removed.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/63557/ 2025-11-25T00:47:09Z http://forum.redump.org/post/133557/#p133557 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> Deterous wrote:

gmipf's dump PFI has same size as the redump entry (http://redump.org/disc/88608/)
I expect that iRobot's dump is just an underdump, but it would be good to check ISO volume size, as well. Perhaps volume size is 3632462 sectors.

Funnily enough, the ISO and Joliet volume sizes appear to be set to 3632208 sectors, which is 256 sectors smaller than gmipf's dump, and 254 sectors smaller than iR0b0t's dump.  It (coincidentally) being a power of two somehow makes me believe iR0b0t's is an underdump even more.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/63195/ 2025-11-24T13:06:30Z http://forum.redump.org/post/133547/#p133547 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> https://drive.google.com/file/d/19ESMtw … sp=sharing logs from gmipf, just to make it available

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62557/ 2025-11-24T08:11:47Z http://forum.redump.org/post/133542/#p133542 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> gmipf's dump PFI has same size as the redump entry (http://redump.org/disc/88608/)
I expect that iRobot's dump is just an underdump, but it would be good to check ISO volume size, as well. Perhaps volume size is 3632462 sectors.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/63557/ 2025-11-24T07:12:17Z http://forum.redump.org/post/133538/#p133538 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> If you have the logs for gmipf's dump, what size does the PFI report?

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/63195/ 2025-11-24T06:57:01Z http://forum.redump.org/post/133537/#p133537 <![CDATA[Re: [FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> Same barcode and same ringcodes, i think that the older dump from iRobot can be made red, as we don't even have logs for that.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62557/ 2025-11-23T23:12:29Z http://forum.redump.org/post/133523/#p133523 <![CDATA[[FIXED][IBM PC] Myst: Die Trilogie]]> http://redump.org/disc/18155/ matches http://redump.org/disc/88608/ if you trim off the last 4096 bytes from the latter.

The ringcodes are the same. 88608 was dumped using DIC on Linux by gmipf. The other is an iR0b0t dump from 2011.

Is one of these a bad dump?

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/63146/ 2025-11-11T15:43:26Z http://forum.redump.org/post/133130/#p133130