<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Redump Forum — Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors.]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/atom/topic/5628/" />
	<updated>2010-01-09T12:53:52Z</updated>
	<generator version="1.4.4">PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.redump.org/topic/5628/audio-tracks-with-quality-100-but-no-read-errors/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/22895/#p22895" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ah, okay then. It had me worried with Revolution X that the &quot;corrected sectors&quot; were null.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[velocity37]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/10769/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-09T12:53:52Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/22895/#p22895</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/22894/#p22894" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Track quality &lt; 100% just means that EAC had to do some error correction on one or more sectors. As long as it doesn&#039;t report read errors it&#039;s fine, don&#039;t worry about it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[r09]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/4460/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-09T12:50:56Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/22894/#p22894</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Audio tracks with quality <100%, but no read errors.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/22893/#p22893" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello all.</p><p>I&#039;ve ran into this on a couple of discs and I seek advice. At the end of the track&#039;s read, one of the rows of EAC&#039;s error correction will start to light up. The resulting track has a quality &gt;= 99.7%.</p><p>One disk I ran into this I know is a good dump, as the track matches one in the db (Battle Arena Toshinden Remix, Saturn, Track 10).</p><p>I have two Playstation games at the moment that do this as well. Agile Warrior F-IIIX and Revolution X. Agile Warrior does this on Track 9, and Revolution X does it on 5, 7, and 11. With these two discs, I have no db entries to compare my dump to.</p><p>How should I proceed? I have a PX-760A coming in the mail, so I can try some plextor-specific tools. (Need it to dump the last track on that pesky +588 saturn game <img src="http://forum.redump.org/img/smilies/cool.png" width="15" height="15" alt="cool" /> )</p><p>Verified Revolution X<br />-----------------------------------<br />Edit: Matched a web dump to my Revolution X Track 5 with some sample shifting, so this is truly the way the disc is. I did not expect this at all. When originally checking my dumps, since the tracks were signed RIFF WAVE, I determined the file length based on the header and extracted a proper WAV. The result was a file that had blank samples at the end, which didn&#039;t happen with the 100% tracks. The disc must have just been made badly :S</p><p>I expect I&#039;ll find the same with tracks 7 and 11, but I&#039;ll check.</p><p>Yep, all three tracks match after sample shifting.<br />-----------------------------------</p><p>I&#039;ll have to see if I can find something to match up to Agile Warrior. What are some general rules of thumb on this though?</p><p>Verified Agile Warrior<br />-----------------------------------<br />Web version only had one data track, but I was able to match the start and end of the track. The file didn&#039;t match exactly, as the web version had its data stored in a data track vs an audio track, but I was able to align the ends of each, verifying that my end sectors are good.<br />-----------------------------------</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[velocity37]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/10769/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-09T10:09:42Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/22893/#p22893</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
