<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Redump Forum — Discs with non-compliant sector in the end that have to be descrambled]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/atom/topic/53678/" />
	<updated>2024-02-21T01:56:54Z</updated>
	<generator version="1.4.4">PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.redump.org/topic/53678/discs-with-noncompliant-sector-in-the-end-that-have-to-be-descrambled/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Discs with non-compliant sector in the end that have to be descrambled]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/115093/#p115093" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I asked a similar issue to F1ReB4LL in the past.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>F1ReB4LL wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>sarami wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Some PC Engine CD have 00:02:74 pregap in track 02 (e.g. <a href="http://redump.org/disc/40354/).">http://redump.org/disc/40354/).</a><br />These 1st 75 pregaps have &quot;audio&quot; flag in sub Qchannel.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>LBA[003434, 0x00d6a]: P[ff], Q[01020000020500004759a14d]{Audio, 2ch, Copy NG, Pre-emphasis No, Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:02:05], AMSF[00:47:59]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003435, 0x00d6b]: P[ff], Q[01020000020400004760ac66]{Audio, 2ch, Copy NG, Pre-emphasis No, Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:02:04], AMSF[00:47:60]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003436, 0x00d6c]: P[ff], Q[01020000020300004761db93]{Audio, 2ch, Copy NG, Pre-emphasis No, Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:02:03], AMSF[00:47:61]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003437, 0x00d6d]: P[ff], Q[0102000002020000476241a1]{Audio, 2ch, Copy NG, Pre-emphasis No, Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:02:02], AMSF[00:47:62]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003438, 0x00d6e]: P[ff], Q[01020000020100004763bf52]{Audio, 2ch, Copy NG, Pre-emphasis No, Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:02:01], AMSF[00:47:63]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003439, 0x00d6f]: P[ff], Q[0102000002000000476465e4]{Audio, 2ch, Copy NG, Pre-emphasis No, Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:02:00], AMSF[00:47:64]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003440, 0x00d70]: P[ff], Q[010200000174000047652fa5]{Audio, 2ch, Copy NG, Pre-emphasis No, Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:01:74], AMSF[00:47:65]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003441, 0x00d71]: P[ff], Q[410200000173000047660a08]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:01:73], AMSF[00:47:66]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003442, 0x00d72]: P[ff], Q[41020000017200004767b078]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:01:72], AMSF[00:47:67]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003443, 0x00d73]: P[ff], Q[41020000017100004768af45]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:01:71], AMSF[00:47:68]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003444, 0x00d74]: P[ff], Q[410200000170000047691535]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:01:70], AMSF[00:47:69]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]
LBA[003445, 0x00d75]: P[ff], Q[410200000169000047703a0b]{ Data,      Copy NG,                  Track[02], Idx[00], RMSF[00:01:69], AMSF[00:47:70]}, RtoW[0, 0, 0, 0]</code></pre></div><p>These &quot;audio&quot; sectors should not be descrambled? LBA 3440 have sync, msf and mode, but it&#039;s audio in sub Q.</p></blockquote></div><p>If to follow the red/yellow book standard, the first second (75 sectors) has the same mode as the previous track, should be left scrambled, the rest of pregap (150 sectors) - descrambled. But due to some kind of a mastering error the first second is 74 sectors, not 75, I guess? So the 74 sectors should be left as is and the next 150 sectors descrambled, I think.<br />If to follow the TOC logic (next track starts at index 01 and index 00 belongs to the previous track) - the entire pregap should be left scrambled.<br />If to follow the sub logic (next track starts at index 00) - all the pregap sectors should be descrambled if possible.</p><p>So, probably it is better to descramble those.</p></blockquote></div><p>The above case is that track 1 is <strong>audio</strong>, track 2 is <strong>data</strong>. But in case of &quot;CD-i / Video CD Titel-Neuheiten II/95&quot;, track 1 is <strong>data</strong>, track 2 is <strong>audio</strong>.<br />Then, if to follow the red/yellow book standard, the first second (75 sectors) has the same mode as the previous track, should be <strong>descrambled</strong>, the rest of pregap (150 sectors) - <strong>left scrambled</strong>.<br />If to follow the TOC logic (next track starts at index 01 and index 00 belongs to the previous track) - the entire pregap should be <strong>descrambled</strong>.<br />If to follow the sub logic (next track starts at index 00) - all the pregap sectors should be <strong>left scrambled</strong> if possible.</p><p>So, probably it is better to <strong>left scrambled</strong> those.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sarami]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/12356/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-02-21T01:56:54Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/115093/#p115093</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Discs with non-compliant sector in the end that have to be descrambled]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/115059/#p115059" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Additionally, I&#039;ll add that really any CD-i discs should be currently dumped by redumper as the strongly preferred program for redump purposes.&nbsp; </p><p>Perhaps a notation or comment of some sort may be helpful on these particular affected discs, but I don&#039;t know or have a strong opinion there.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sadikyo]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/62723/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-02-20T18:32:11Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/115059/#p115059</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Discs with non-compliant sector in the end that have to be descrambled]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/115057/#p115057" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Pardon the verbose title. I want a dedicated topic to this discussion so it doesn&#039;t become an obscured nuance that need-be tracked across several random threads.</p><p>Required reading: <a href="https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImageCreator/issues/250">https://github.com/saramibreak/DiscImag … issues/250</a></p><p>All known examples (all of which are correctly dumped in redump by the redumper app):<br />-&quot;CD-i / Video CD Titel-Neuheiten II/95&quot;, see further convo: <a href="http://forum.redump.org/topic/53657/fixed-cdi-track-2-wrong-in-cdi-video-cd-titelneuheiten-ii95/">http://forum.redump.org/topic/53657/fix … iten-ii95/</a><br />-all 7th Guests Philips CDi&#039;s (doesn&#039;t include Disc 2 Audio CD of course) - <a href="http://redump.org/discs/quicksearch/7th-guest/sort/system/">http://redump.org/discs/quicksearch/7th … rt/system/</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-02-20T18:25:43Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/115057/#p115057</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
