<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Redump Forum — Karaoke]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/atom/topic/30583" />
	<updated>2022-12-11T17:18:36Z</updated>
	<generator version="1.4.4">PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.redump.org/topic/30583/karaoke/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/105735/#p105735" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Mod consensus on the discord is that Karaoke discs of formats that aren&#039;t automatically qualified for Redump should not be included at redump (VCD, CD+G, DVD-Video), and No-Intro Non-Redump dats would serve as a better home. If any Mod cares to challenge this and hold a vote - by all means do so. But otherwise, this question should be considered answered.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-12-11T17:18:36Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/105735/#p105735</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/103741/#p103741" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that&#039;s what spurred this change, I suggested putting iKTV stuff in the TKS dat, but Fireball wasn&#039;t keen on that and said to just use the iKTV dat.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[NovaAurora]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/63077/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-09-09T16:58:48Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/103741/#p103741</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/103740/#p103740" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Never noticed this. Looks like Kiss-Site and iKTV are the same hardware set. <a href="https://twitter.com/MrBurns32X/status/1567192746267648000?t=7dlFBoG7-YT4cwEmOLGjrw&amp;s=19">https://twitter.com/MrBurns32X/status/1 … w&amp;s=19</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-09-09T16:43:48Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/103740/#p103740</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/103725/#p103725" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s either this or Kiss-Site and iKTV get removed entirely, and put into the VCD dat with (Kiss-Site) and (iKTV) added to the end. Which I consider much worse than what we have now.</p><p>We cannot create new dats, it&#039;s important to emphasize that and remind people of our lack of power on the site because of our incompetent site admin.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[NovaAurora]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/63077/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-09-08T21:04:19Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/103725/#p103725</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/103719/#p103719" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="codebox"><pre><code>Karaoke-CD 1.0 is the first version of the Video-CD specification</code></pre></div><p>Just to clarify for the iKTV and Kiss-Site, the format is standard VCD. It doesn&#039;t make any sense to split them off into their own dat per existing rules for other systems. I&#039;m just seeking clarification because it appears redump is breaking their own rules for iKTV and Kiss-Site branded VCDs.</p><p>For example, if iKTV and Kiss-Site branded VCDs beings split-off into their own dats was based on an established rule:<br />-Philips CDi branded VCDs should have their own dedicated set.<br />-Philips CDi branded Photo CDs should have their own dedicated set.<br />-3DO branded Photo CDs should have their own dedicated set.<br />-Hundreds of VCD Karaoke series should each get their own set.</p><p>I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a few other examples to be found, but the above came to mind quite readily does make an interesting case for what an established rule would look like. Not that I expect any codified rule to clear this up because quite frankly no one&#039;s all that interested in VCD or Karaoke (including me tbh), but splitting the same format into multiple dats arbitrarily does give me OCD.</p><p>Alright, manifesto finished and I rest my case. I&#039;ll leave this in the hands of the mods.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-09-08T16:44:53Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/103719/#p103719</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/103700/#p103700" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>user7 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>&gt;To play devil&#039;s advocate, shouldn&#039;t we split off the Philips CD-i branded VCDs then into their own dat?</p></blockquote></div><p>&quot;Phillips CD-i branded VCDs&quot; is a step in the wrong direction.<br />Video CDs must contain a corresponding application for playback on CD-i players by specification (White Book, CD-I Bridge). If they don&#039;t then they are not real Video CDs (even if other players don&#039;t care).</p><p>Rather than splitting off Philips CD-i (and/or marking most of them with comments that &quot;this disc is compatible with CD-i&quot;), it should be noted down if a disc is NOT compatible with Philips CD-i and then maybe even thrown away because it is not a real VCD (see above).</p><p>Coming back to Karaoke: Karaoke-CD 1.0 is the first version of the Video-CD specification. So they are all one big happy family.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rosewood]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/7347/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-09-07T05:35:39Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/103700/#p103700</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/103694/#p103694" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I feel iKTV and Kiss-Site should remain separate as they&#039;re dedicated discs for specific systems (Even if they&#039;re playable on other devices).</p><p>To play devil&#039;s advocate, shouldn&#039;t we split off the Philips CD-i branded VCDs then into their own dat?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-09-07T03:09:58Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/103694/#p103694</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/103689/#p103689" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>My personal opinion on the matter:<br />Yes, Karaoke should be datted by Redump. It&#039;s a bit of a grey area but if we don&#039;t dat it, it&#039;ll likely be lost.<br />I feel iKTV and Kiss-Site should remain separate as they&#039;re dedicated discs for specific systems (Even if they&#039;re playable on other devices).<br />Karaoke should be a category in my opinion, like Games, Video, Add-Ons, etc.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[NovaAurora]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/63077/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-09-07T01:25:24Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/103689/#p103689</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/103688/#p103688" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to bump this discussion to seek clarity / rules about datting Karaoke VCDs.</p><p><strong>1)</strong><br />I noticed that iKTV and Kiss-Site have their own respective dats:<br /><a href="http://redump.org/discs/system/iktv/">http://redump.org/discs/system/iktv/</a><br /><a href="http://redump.org/discs/system/ksite/">http://redump.org/discs/system/ksite/</a></p><p>I think this probably is not a great idea because they appear to just be standard VCDs, and there are countless karaoke VCDs / series. So it would kind of be like datting Photo CDs that are branded 3DO under the 3DO system.</p><p>If we want the karaoke VCDs separate from the other VCDs, maybe we have a &#039;VCD - Karaoke&#039; dat?</p><br /><p><strong>2)</strong><br />In the past we&#039;ve kind of touched on whether or not Karaoke qualifies as a game and should be included. Can we establish a rule one way or the other? For example if Karaoke VCDs are dattable, are karaoke CD+G or karaoke DVD? Not that I think anyone is going after these discs per se. If we&#039;re taking votes, personally I think karaoke could be considered a game.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-09-07T01:20:35Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/103688/#p103688</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/82636/#p82636" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s no gameplay difference between cd+g and iktv, it seems like a very arbitrary decision to keep one but not the other.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-08-18T03:49:39Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/82636/#p82636</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/82632/#p82632" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>user7 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I think I&#039;ll pass, if no one is going to define rules that universally apply, I&#039;m not going to waste my money to see the category get nuked over a change of heart.</p></blockquote></div><p>Why should we nuke them? iKTV and Kiss-Site have their own sections already, while CD+Gs belong to the Audio CD section due to their nature (and it&#039;s probably not the best idea to throw hundreds of karaoke discs there).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[F1ReB4LL]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/13/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-08-17T23:32:59Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/82632/#p82632</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/82617/#p82617" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>&gt;need some additional examination about whether they only play Video CDs or have some basic interactivity as well.</p><p>So basically they could have the same game-play functionality of CD-Gs?</p><p>I think I&#039;ll pass, if no one is going to define rules that universally apply, I&#039;m not going to waste my money to see the category get nuked over a change of heart.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-08-17T12:27:13Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/82617/#p82617</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/82611/#p82611" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ehh. CD+G discs are normal Audio CDs and fall under the same rules, but we need a way to either attach a subchannel file or, at least, its checksum into the dat.<br />iKTV and Kiss-Site need some additional examination about whether they only play Video CDs or have some basic interactivity as well.<br />Anyway, iKTV and Kiss-Site can be locked within their own sections, since they don&#039;t have too many releases.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[F1ReB4LL]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/13/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-08-16T21:12:04Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/82611/#p82611</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/82571/#p82571" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I would say yes to all TBH. </p><p>speaking of which,&nbsp; have just taken delivery of 25 Kiss-Site discs. (and more on the way) <br />if you can forgive the potato camera quality</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/688192258406875248/743918078064328804/IMG_20200814_204326.jpg" alt="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/688192258406875248/743918078064328804/IMG_20200814_204326.jpg" /></span></p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/688192258406875248/743918104031002665/IMG_20200814_204348.jpg" alt="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/688192258406875248/743918104031002665/IMG_20200814_204348.jpg" /></span></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[wiggy2k]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/62476/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-08-15T17:49:14Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/82571/#p82571</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Karaoke]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/82489/#p82489" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Madroms wrote:</cite><blockquote><p> I think they are not useful for redump.<br />So what to do with them also ?</p></blockquote></div><p>That&#039;s the broader question. Is &quot;just karaoke&quot; (iKTV / CD-G, etc) a &quot;game&quot; / should we dat it here?</p><p>My vote is yes. But I got a feeling it will be up to iRobot. Either way there is no gameplay functionality difference between iKTV and CD-G karaoke, so the decision should be the same on both.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[user7]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-08-12T20:18:10Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/82489/#p82489</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
