<![CDATA[Redump Forum — [Solved] Question about 'Ripping the audio tracks' in guide]]> 2008-02-07T02:01:59Z PunBB http://forum.redump.org/topic/2520/solved-question-about-ripping-the-audio-tracks-in-guide/ <![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Question about 'Ripping the audio tracks' in guide]]> Vigi wrote:

What we meant is 'go back 149 sectors, then one more' (so 150 in total) because sometimes if you go back 150 at once it won't show any garbage.

Sorry, I overlooked the next line.
Thanks.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4225/ 2008-02-07T02:01:59Z http://forum.redump.org/post/5752/#p5752 <![CDATA[Re: [Solved] Question about 'Ripping the audio tracks' in guide]]> fuzzball wrote:

Determining the (factory) write offset
If the Track02 pregap was 2 seconds, or 150 sectors, go back 149 sectors (substract 149 from from the number in the white box);

Is the part of an underline right? Or is 'go back 150 sectors'?

What we meant is 'go back 149 sectors, then one more' (so 150 in total) because sometimes if you go back 150 at once it won't show any garbage.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/8/ 2008-02-06T18:24:22Z http://forum.redump.org/post/5749/#p5749 <![CDATA[[Solved] Question about 'Ripping the audio tracks' in guide]]>

Determining the (factory) write offset
If the Track02 pregap was 2 seconds, or 150 sectors, go back 149 sectors (substract 149 from from the number in the white box);

Is the part of an underline right? Or is 'go back 150 sectors'?

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4225/ 2008-02-06T15:36:16Z http://forum.redump.org/post/5744/#p5744