<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Redump Forum — Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/atom/topic/17553/" />
	<updated>2018-04-12T10:03:16Z</updated>
	<generator version="1.4.4">PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.redump.org/topic/17553/some-nooby-questions-about-the-macintosh-stuff-here/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59876/#p59876" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>ajshell1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>And should the Turbo-CD database be split based on which version of the System Card they use?</p></blockquote></div><p>Not really. Many of the Super System titles have some fancy screens if run on 1.x/2.x cards. Dracula X even has a mini-game there. And you can&#039;t run Win32 programs on Win16 at all (there&#039;s a Win32s extender for Win 3.x, though, but it&#039;s a different story).</p><p>Win16, Win32, Win64 sections should be enough, Win95/98 can go to the comments, though, there are titles that require exactly Windows 95 and can&#039;t be run on Windows 98 as well as titles that want Windows 98 or newer and can&#039;t be run on 95.</p><p>OS Tag isn&#039;t enough for these. Also, x64 soft requires x64 hardware and it is way different from x86, that&#039;s just not correct to put them into the same section.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[F1ReB4LL]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/13/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-12T10:03:16Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59876/#p59876</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59875/#p59875" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>OS tagging can become quite a nightmare though. is it enough to say &quot;DOS&quot;, &quot;Win16&quot;, &quot;win32&quot; etc and make assumptions about possible compatibility? or do we copy what the disc says &quot;Win95-98&quot; etc?<br />It&#039;s a dimention that would be great to capture, of course, but if required upfront mike make dumping just that much more cumbersome.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[emuLOAD]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/328/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-12T07:44:09Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59875/#p59875</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59862/#p59862" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>ajshell1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I agree.</p><p>BUT, we have 13297 existing PC dumps.</p><p>Who&#039;s going to fill in that info for all those discs?</p></blockquote></div><p>The dumpers probably. Shouldn&#039;t be much different from other additions and fixes</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[FatArnold]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/12451/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-11T19:29:28Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59862/#p59862</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59860/#p59860" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>FatArnold wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I personally think an OS tag would be a thing to introduce. It would absolutely benefit macOS and PC.</p></blockquote></div><p>I agree.</p><p>BUT, we have 13297 existing PC dumps.</p><p>Who&#039;s going to fill in that info for all those discs?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[ajshell1]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/62552/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-11T18:52:04Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59860/#p59860</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59858/#p59858" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I personally think an OS tag would be a thing to introduce. It would absolutely benefit macOS and PC.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[FatArnold]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/12451/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-11T18:02:45Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59858/#p59858</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59857/#p59857" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this, but what is to be done with discs that can run on both 68k AND PPC Macs?</p><p>And should the Turbo-CD database be split based on which version of the System Card they use?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[ajshell1]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/62552/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-11T17:05:03Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59857/#p59857</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59665/#p59665" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Probably worth to split the Mac section to 68k, PPC and Intel sections, these are different devices with a different architecture. Same for &#039;normal&#039; Amiga and Amiga PPC.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[F1ReB4LL]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/13/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-04T00:21:31Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59665/#p59665</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59653/#p59653" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>1) Anything called a Macintosh disc, yes. Further notes about generations would not hurt.<br />2) Hybrid discs go into PC section as of now, with a note being a hybrid disc.<br />3) Its same, yes.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[iR0b0t]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/4357/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-03T15:03:33Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59653/#p59653</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Some nooby questions about the Macintosh stuff here]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/59651/#p59651" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>1) Does this refer to 68k Macs (probably not, looking at the discs that are listed there)? PPC? Intel? Mac OS 9? Mac OS X? Just anything called Macintosh?<br />2) How do hybrid discs work? Do they get listed under both PC and Mac, or just one of them?<br />3) Is the preferred dumping method the same as on PC?</p><p>I ask because I might have a few ancient Mac games lying around, I&#039;ll have to see later if I can get DiscImageCreator working.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Zowayix]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/62628/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-03T14:53:14Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/59651/#p59651</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
