<![CDATA[Redump Forum — [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> 2020-03-07T06:10:57Z PunBB http://forum.redump.org/topic/16655/ibm-pc-games-to-redump/ <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> I verified that VOB Protect CD has illegal MSF, so these all need to be redumped without /sf

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/10468/ 2020-03-07T06:10:57Z http://forum.redump.org/post/78031/#p78031 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> Sweet, now we just need the rest.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/10468/ 2019-09-10T00:51:45Z http://forum.redump.org/post/73061/#p73061 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> Nexy wrote:

It is, the first sector usually has something other than 00 in it.

Perfect. Both Hugo: Nell'Isola Selvaggia and WarChiefs are now fixed.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62655/ 2019-09-09T09:09:33Z http://forum.redump.org/post/73058/#p73058 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> It is, the first sector usually has something other than 00 in it.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/10468/ 2019-09-08T19:46:43Z http://forum.redump.org/post/73030/#p73030 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> Just redumped http://redump.org/disc/63746/ without /sf, 10 bad MSF errors. Those sectors are entirely filled with 0x00 but the sync. I hope this is correct for SmartE.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62655/ 2019-09-08T12:56:12Z http://forum.redump.org/post/73019/#p73019 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> There are also other discs like that, but yes.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4357/ 2019-09-07T20:16:59Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72995/#p72995 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> iR0b0t wrote:

There are as of now just 41 discs with yellow status, which clearly don't belong into a datfile because they are either overdumped, underdumped or pirate discs.

You do realize, of course, that all your other X360 German demo dumps were verified, yet the unverified ones are still yellow on that list?

Not so clear.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/ 2019-09-07T20:11:34Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72994/#p72994 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> Simple thing. Throw few k $$$ into these titles and turn them proper green. Any volunteers? wink

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62415/ 2019-09-07T20:02:54Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72993/#p72993 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://redump.org/discs/status/3/

There are as of now just 41 discs with yellow status, which clearly don't belong into a datfile because they are either overdumped, underdumped or pirate discs.

You do have a full list of discs to be redumped listed above, no need to mark them yellow.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4357/ 2019-09-07T20:01:00Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72992/#p72992 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> Jackal wrote:

If you change them to yellow, people will discard the dumps and this will hurt preservation.

I agree completely, which is why we should have Yellow dumps in the datfile. iRobot... come around man.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/ 2019-09-05T20:59:05Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72964/#p72964 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> LoStraniero91 wrote:

http://redump.org/disc/63292/

The Lite-On SOHD-167T managed to read sector 4953, bringing the total error count to 960. I think that's the max it could do. I tried re-reading the sectors "before" the good ones 50 times and it failed.

960 is correct for that variation of LaserLock. Bare in mind that you'll have to reread the "lone" error sectors in scrambled mode as they are soft errors that are no longer being replaced with 0x55.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62556/ 2019-09-05T20:54:27Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72963/#p72963 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> http://redump.org/disc/63292/

The Lite-On SOHD-167T managed to read sector 4953, bringing the total error count to 960. I think that's the max it could do. I tried re-reading the sectors "before" the good ones 50 times and it failed.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62655/ 2019-09-05T18:25:17Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72956/#p72956 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> iR0b0t doesnt want yellow dumps in the datfile.

If you change them to yellow, people will discard the dumps and this will hurt preservation. It will not motivate people in any way to buy them and redump them. We're already doing the best we can.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/8/ 2019-09-03T03:58:37Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72915/#p72915 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> They should be yellow imo, they are bad dumps. I have redumped my SmartE discs and reminded others to do the same. If we need to re-collect some discs due to people selling them, then they should be added to whichever spreadsheet and marked high priority.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/10468/ 2019-09-03T00:10:44Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72911/#p72911 <![CDATA[Re: [IBM PC] Games to redump]]> Why not just include yellows in the dat? That would ensure redump remains accurate and kills two birds.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/6888/ 2019-09-02T18:00:59Z http://forum.redump.org/post/72895/#p72895