<![CDATA[Redump Forum — [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> 2017-12-27T13:10:15Z PunBB http://forum.redump.org/topic/16343/resolved-how-many-number-of-errors/ <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> I think you should change the "Errors Count" to "Errors & Warnings Count", otherwise, it's too confusing.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/13/ 2017-12-27T13:10:15Z http://forum.redump.org/post/57621/#p57621 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> "edccchk" won't list those rare cases with corrupted sectors or silent sectors as errored data sectors, they will be listed as "non-data sectors". And for discs with audio tracks in the current state it won't be possible to distinguish between audio and corrupted data sectors, as they are mixed in one line.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4357/ 2017-09-03T23:17:08Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56027/#p56027 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> iR0b0t wrote:

Those cases are an exception. Anyways, CDmage is way more worse, it is counting WARNING cases to the total errors count.

Then you should either rename it to "errors/warning", "unusual sectors" or something similar OR to add the "warnings" field as well.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/13/ 2017-09-03T22:57:49Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56026/#p56026 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> sarami wrote:

From when? If the error counts of CDMage isn't adopted forever, I think the old dump that has errors should be rechecked. Or already rechecked?

A long time ago, 1-2 years. The old values weren't rechecked i think, but we would only have to recheck discs with errors count > 1

F1ReB4LL wrote:

Better not to, due to http://forum.redump.org/post/55408/#p55408 at least.

Those cases are an exception. Anyways, CDmage is way more worse, it is counting WARNING cases to the total errors count.

ack2121 wrote:

edccchk v1.26 errors+warnings count = CDMage error count

See above smile

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4357/ 2017-09-03T20:35:44Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56022/#p56022 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> I find for psx-j that:

edccchk v1.26 errors+warnings count = CDMage error count

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62397/ 2017-09-03T19:11:31Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56021/#p56021 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> iR0b0t wrote:

Not really. I have extra updated the submission form text with "Errors count (edccchk v1.26)" to be used with.

Better not to, due to http://forum.redump.org/post/55408/#p55408 at least.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/13/ 2017-09-03T14:00:33Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56016/#p56016 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> iR0b0t wrote:

Not really. I have extra updated the submission form text with "Errors count (edccchk v1.26)" to be used with.

From when? If the error counts of CDMage isn't adopted forever, I think the old dump that has errors should be rechecked. Or already rechecked?

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/12356/ 2017-09-03T13:54:42Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56014/#p56014 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> sarami wrote:

but redump db adopts that of CDMage

Not really. I have extra updated the submission form text with "Errors count (edccchk v1.26)" to be used with.


EdcEcc  > [ERROR] Number of sector(s) where user data doesn't match the expected ECC/EDC: 1
edccchk > Total errors............ 1

either one or the other should be used

NO CDmage

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4357/ 2017-09-03T13:38:48Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56012/#p56012 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> retaliator have the same error disc by chance.
http://forum.redump.org/topic/16342/add … ification/

[ERROR] Number of sector(s) where user data doesn't match the expected ECC/EDC: 1
    Sector: 113551, 
  :
  :
[WARNING] Number of sector(s) where flag byte doesn't zero: 3
    Sector: 10535, 15956, 17753, 
Total errors: 1

EccEdc adopts the errors count of edccchk, but redump db adopts that of CDMage. http://redump.org/disc/327/

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/12356/ 2017-09-03T13:28:11Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56010/#p56010 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> F1ReB4LL wrote:

And edccchk (for comparison)? I'm not sure what does "flag byte doesn't zero" mean.

edccchk  1.26

edccchk - CD image EDC/ECC Checker
v1.26 (32-bit Windows, MinGW, large file support)
  Copyright (C) 2013 Natalia Portillo
  http://www.claunia.com/
  based on ecm v1.03
  Copyright (C) 2002-2011 Neill Corlett
Checking dic\dic.img...
Subheader copies differ in mode 2 form 2 sector at address: 00:02:12
Mode 2 form 1 sector with error at address: 07:14:31
07:14:31: Failed ECC P
07:14:31: Failed ECC Q
Non-data sectors........ 50166
Mode 0 sectors.......... 0
        with errors..... 0
Mode 1 sectors.......... 0
        with errors..... 0
Mode 2 form 1 sectors... 32428
        with errors..... 1
        with warnings... 0
Mode 2 form 2 sectors... 4
        with errors..... 0
        with warnings... 1
Total sectors........... 82598
Total errors............ 1
Total warnings.......... 1
Total errors+warnings... 2
Done
]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4225/ 2017-09-03T12:58:06Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56007/#p56007 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> It's this:

if(sector[0x10] == sector[0x14] && sector[0x11] == sector[0x15] && sector[0x12] == sector[0x16] && sector[0x13] == sector[0x17]) { OK } else { FLAGS_NOT_SAME }

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/62415/ 2017-09-03T11:51:43Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56006/#p56006 <![CDATA[Re: [Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> And edccchk (for comparison)? I'm not sure what does "flag byte doesn't zero" mean.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/13/ 2017-09-03T11:41:52Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56005/#p56005 <![CDATA[[Resolved] How many number of errors?]]> dic.img_EdcEcc.txt

[ERROR] Number of sector(s) where user data doesn't match the expected ECC/EDC: 1
    Sector: 32431, 
[INFO] Number of sector(s) where while user data does match the expected ECC/EDC there is no EDC: 4
    Sector: 13, 14, 15, 32431, 
[WARNING] Number of sector(s) where flag byte doesn't zero: 1
    Sector: 12,

CDMage

Image has 2 corrupted sectors.

Sector ... Severity
   162     High
32,581     Low
]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4225/ 2017-09-03T10:38:19Z http://forum.redump.org/post/56004/#p56004