<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Redump Forum — Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/atom/topic/16283/" />
	<updated>2017-08-14T12:23:20Z</updated>
	<generator version="1.4.4">PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.redump.org/topic/16283/rise-from-your-grave-redump-pclone-dats/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/55786/#p55786" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi iR0bot. Thanks for dropping in, and thank you for all the great work you&#039;ve done for Redump <img src="http://forum.redump.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>I think it may worth exploring &#039;why&#039; parent / clone DATs are desirable. Personally, I like the notion of &#039;game families&#039;. I like the separation of &#039;unique&#039; software for a platform - it makes exploring software libraries more manageable. I frequently ask myself the question: &#039;How many unique titles were released for system X&#039;?. Grouping a game&#039;s parts (discs, for example) is one element of that, as is the higher-level &#039;Family&#039; encapsulation.</p><p>I would love to know what others think of this. Why do they want p/clone DATs? Do they share my mindset that this kind of grouping is a good tool for helping with in the study of games?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[midget35]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/62540/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-08-14T12:23:20Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/55786/#p55786</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/55781/#p55781" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There is no priority on that list, the comment on priority is only valid for the first list &quot;working on, priority order desc&quot;,which is empty just yet.</p><p>Right now i am working things down which i think are the fastest to be done with. But i can change it on request.</p><p>The p/clone dats is a difficult topic, before i can do anything on it i need to have a good plan on how to realize it. The discussion on that topic link was not resulting in a final plan.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[iR0b0t]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/4357/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-08-14T11:35:49Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/55781/#p55781</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/55779/#p55779" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jackal. It&#039;s a shame to see p/clone far down the list of priorities, but the higher priority items are justified (sub-channel data, clrmame support, etc).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[midget35]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/62540/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-08-14T11:14:32Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/55779/#p55779</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/55778/#p55778" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s still on the TODO list - <a href="http://forum.redump.org/topic/7446/database-todo-shedule/">http://forum.redump.org/topic/7446/data … o-shedule/</a><br />iR0b0t is the only site coder, so no idea if or when this will be implemented.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jackal]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/8/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-08-14T10:52:28Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/55778/#p55778</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Rise from your grave - Redump p/clone DATs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/55777/#p55777" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p><p>Half a decade ago (!) there were rumblings that Redump might support p/clone DATs. The post I found is here:<br /><a href="http://forum.redump.org/topic/12875/datfiles-and-parentclone-relationships/">http://forum.redump.org/topic/12875/dat … tionships/</a></p><p>I am wondering - is this something the community is interested in, and if so, what have the obstacles been in making these DATs a reality?</p><p>I ask because I have been working on a tool that helps automatically group games into their parent / clone relationships. If the sheer manual labour involved has been an obstacle in the past, my tools will surely help.</p><p>Appreciate your thoughts on this. Cheers.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[midget35]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/62540/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-08-14T10:15:57Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/55777/#p55777</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
