<![CDATA[Redump Forum — Submissions: how should this look like]]> 2014-05-25T20:54:07Z PunBB http://forum.redump.org/topic/13729/submissions-how-should-this-look-like/ <![CDATA[Re: Submissions: how should this look like]]> 300 dpi is enough for processed images (filtered, descreened, etc.), but the originals should be in 600 dpi raw.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/13/ 2014-05-25T20:54:07Z http://forum.redump.org/post/47639/#p47639 <![CDATA[Re: Submissions: how should this look like]]> Well, you know where you can find my covers (300 dpi)... PsxDatacenter (thanks goes to gladiator)
I always give info like which barcode corresponds to which languages (manual & covers) but I believe we need a good 300 dpi/demoired covers database.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4321/ 2014-05-17T17:03:12Z http://forum.redump.org/post/47534/#p47534 <![CDATA[Re: Submissions: how should this look like]]> Better store covers with the actual dumps? big_smile

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4396/ 2014-05-17T16:22:08Z http://forum.redump.org/post/47533/#p47533 <![CDATA[Re: Submissions: how should this look like]]> And those "engrish" translations on the sides of Japanese jewels as well?

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/13/ 2014-05-09T21:41:05Z http://forum.redump.org/post/47373/#p47373 <![CDATA[Submissions: how should this look like]]> To discover different releases and or possible misprints everything taken from covers
(incl. disc label print, which contains the serial) has to be cataloged AS IS.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/4357/ 2014-03-20T15:33:37Z http://forum.redump.org/post/46909/#p46909