<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Redump Forum — File date questions]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.redump.org/feed/atom/topic/13146/" />
	<updated>2013-08-23T01:09:05Z</updated>
	<generator version="1.4.4">PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.redump.org/topic/13146/file-date-questions/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: File date questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/44735/#p44735" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I may resort to using that date to organize my PS2 game collection. Originally I&#039;d wanted to do release date, but that information is inconsistent across the web, and some of the dates are just downright silly, like Q-Ball Billiards Master being released in February 2000. Not only is that 8 months before the PS2 was even released, but it&#039;s 7 months before the EXE date on the disc. THAT disc really WOULD have had to go into the future like I joked. So then I had the idea to arrange by latest file date on the disc (the date the disc was &quot;completed&quot;), but that seems to be impossible to determine due to hidden files. So, maybe I&#039;ll use the EXE dates. Alphabetical order is just so... boring.</p><p>Well, thanks again pablogm123.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Lorem__Ipsum]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/57764/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-08-23T01:09:05Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/44735/#p44735</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: File date questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/44734/#p44734" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I mean the build date of the executable file of the disc.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pablogm123]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/12852/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-08-23T00:54:45Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/44734/#p44734</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: File date questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/44733/#p44733" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Okay, 2 and 3 were answered perfectly, thanks. I still kind of don&#039;t understand the answer to question 1, since I don&#039;t really know what you mean by build date. My best assumption is that it&#039;s when the disc was &quot;completed&quot; so to speak, but in most cases the system EXE file is not the file with the latest time stamp on the disc. I guess that, in my mind, for a disc to be &quot;built&quot; with files created after the disc was built is chronologically impossible. The disc would have had to go into the future to get those files <img src="http://forum.redump.org/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /> And that probably just shows you how little I know about the whole thing.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Lorem__Ipsum]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/57764/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-08-23T00:44:17Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/44733/#p44733</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: File date questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/44732/#p44732" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>1: Maybe to document the build date/time of PS1/PS2 discs, like the header of Mega-CD/Saturn games.</p><p>2: We have to use the local time stamp so that any user can report the same date/time for a given disc. If not, users from different time zones would report different dates/times for a given disc.</p><p>3: Exe date must be taken from the SLES/SCES/SLUS/SCUS/SLPM... file, not from the SYSTEM.CNF file.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pablogm123]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/12852/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-08-23T00:35:29Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/44732/#p44732</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[File date questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.redump.org/post/44730/#p44730" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A few of them.</p><p>1. What is the significance of the EXE file date? Why take note of the date for that specific file? I don&#039;t see what relevance it has to anything.</p><p>2. Why use the Local Time Stamp option in IsoBuster? I&#039;ve read IsoBuster&#039;s explanation of these two options (Local and Relative) several times, and I just can&#039;t understand what it&#039;s saying. Does Local tell me what time it was in the location the disc was made, and does Relative tell me what time it was in my location? If not, I can&#039;t understand it.</p><p>3. I have it set to Local, but I don&#039;t always match up with the database. Take Forever Kingdom USA for example, my file date says 2001-12-04, I&#039;m pretty sure the database says 2001-12-03. So who did it wrong, me, or the other submitter(s)?</p><p>EDIT: Addition to this question, sometimes it doesn&#039;t match up at all. Take Orphen: Scion of Sorcery USA for example. We have 2000-08-17, I have 2000-09-03.<br /><a href="http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/6831/59xd.jpg">http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/6831/59xd.jpg</a><br />I used the SLUS_200.11 file, the database is currently using the SYSTEM.CNF file which POINTS to the SLUS_200.11 file. That&#039;s a no-no, right? Just checking to see I&#039;m doing it right.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Lorem__Ipsum]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.redump.org/user/57764/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-08-22T23:36:20Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.redump.org/post/44730/#p44730</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
