<![CDATA[Redump Forum — How is the state of PCE dumping?]]> 2013-04-28T15:36:42Z PunBB http://forum.redump.org/topic/12865/how-is-the-state-of-pce-dumping/ <![CDATA[Re: How is the state of PCE dumping?]]> Yes, some were updated. If you have a Plextor, PM me, I'll explain the rest.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/13/ 2013-04-28T15:36:42Z http://forum.redump.org/post/43688/#p43688 <![CDATA[Re: How is the state of PCE dumping?]]> So still a PITA  sad

My hardware tools are the same from a few years ago. Is there something new from the software point of view?

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/2860/ 2013-04-28T13:18:01Z http://forum.redump.org/post/43685/#p43685 <![CDATA[Re: How is the state of PCE dumping?]]> Proper cues can be taken with subdump; if there is a TOC vs sub mismatch - we add the entry with TOC-based gaps as a primary dump and the one with subs-based gaps as a secondary dump which is hidden (for documentation purposes). So, yes, they can be dumped, but still with a lot of manual work smile But you need to use either a Plextor or a swappable drive, since with a regular READ command certain areas can be unreadable for subdump and you won't get a proper .sub and a proper .cue.

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/13/ 2013-04-28T11:57:03Z http://forum.redump.org/post/43682/#p43682 <![CDATA[How is the state of PCE dumping?]]> I noticed PCE dumps have gained momentum on Redump.org. Was there some novelty in PCE world that has made possible to read the discs decently?

]]> http://forum.redump.org/user/2860/ 2013-04-28T11:44:36Z http://forum.redump.org/post/43681/#p43681